Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34452152›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models and Bayes-Based Dosing of Infliximab.

Celine Konecki, Catherine Feliu, Yoann Cazaubon, Delphine Giusti, Marcelle Tonye-Libyh, Hedia Brixi, Guillaume Cadiot, Amélie Biron, Zoubir Djerada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antibody Drug Clearance: An Underexplored Marker of Outcomes with Checkpoint Inhibitors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Celine KoneckiDepartment of Pharmacology, EA 3801, SFR CAP-Santé, Reims University Hospital, 51 rue Cognacq-Jay, CEDEX, 51095 Reims, France.
Catherine FeliuDepartment of Pharmacology, EA 3801, SFR CAP-Santé, Reims University Hospital, 51 rue Cognacq-Jay, CEDEX, 51095 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3928-8908
Yoann CazaubonInstitute Desbrest of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM, University Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1032-0879
Delphine GiustiDepartment of Immunology, Reims University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, CEDEX, 51100 Reims, France.
Marcelle Tonye-LibyhDepartment of Immunology, Reims University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, CEDEX, 51100 Reims, France.
Hedia BrixiDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims-Champagne-Ardennes University, CEDEX, 51100 Reims, France.
Guillaume CadiotDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims-Champagne-Ardennes University, CEDEX, 51100 Reims, France.
Amélie BironDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims-Champagne-Ardennes University, CEDEX, 51100 Reims, France.
Zoubir DjeradaDepartment of Pharmacology, EA 3801, SFR CAP-Santé, Reims University Hospital, 51 rue Cognacq-Jay, CEDEX, 51095 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4022-7889
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the well-demonstrated efficacy of infliximab in inflammatory diseases, treatment failure remains frequent. Dose adjustment using Bayesian methods has shown in silico its interest in achieving target plasma concentrations. However, most of the published models have not been fully validated in accordance with the recommendations. This study aimed to submit these models to an external evaluation and verify their predictive capabilities. Eight models were selected for external evaluation, carried out on an independent database (409 concentrations from 157 patients). Each model was evaluated based on the following parameters: goodness-of-fit (comparison of predictions to observations), residual error model (population weighted residuals (PWRES), individual weighted residuals (IWRES), and normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE)), and predictive performances (prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC) and Bayesian simulations). The performances observed during this external evaluation varied greatly from one model to another. The eight evaluated models showed a significant bias in population predictions (from -7.19 to 7.38 mg/L). Individual predictions showed acceptable bias and precision for six of the eight models (mean error of -0.74 to -0.29 mg/L and mean percent error of -16.6 to -0.4%). Analysis of NPDE and pcVPC confirmed these results and revealed a problem with the inclusion of several covariates (weight, concomitant immunomodulatory treatment, presence of anti-drug antibodies). This external evaluation showed satisfactory results for some models, notably models A and B, and highlighted several prospects for improving the pharmacokinetic models of infliximab for clinical-biological application.

Indexed as

ankylosing spondylitisCrohn’s diseaseexternal evaluationinfliximabpopulation pharmacokineticspsoriatic rheumatismrheumatoid arthritisulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID34452152
PMCPMC8398005
OpenAlexW3192935299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.