Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34453000›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Bayesian metamodeling of complex biological systems across varying representations.

Barak Raveh, Liping Sun, Kate L White, Tanmoy Sanyal, Jeremy Tempkin, Dongqing Zheng, Kala Bharath, Jitin Singla, Chenxi Wang, Jihui Zhao and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrative mapping reveals molecular features underlying the mechanism of nucleocytoplasmic transport.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Integrative spatiotemporal modeling of biomolecular processes: Application to the assembly of the nuclear pore complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Art and Science of Molecular Docking.Annual review of biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emerging maps of allosteric regulation in cellular networks.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Integrative modeling of the cell.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. From integrative structural biology to cell biology.The Journal of biological chemistry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Barak RavehDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Liping SuniHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Kate L WhiteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Tanmoy SanyalDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.ORCID 0000-0002-6009-9431
Jeremy TempkinDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Dongqing ZhengMork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Kala BharathDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Jitin SinglaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridge Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Chenxi WangiHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Jihui ZhaoiHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Angdi LiiHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Nicholas A GrahamMork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Carl KesselmanEpstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Raymond C StevensiHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Andrej SaliDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158; sali@salilab.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-6197

Funding

RESEARCH PROJECT 2U19AI135990 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JEFFERY S COX · 2018 to 2026
$21.4M
TR&D Project 4. The Imaging Stage: Multiscale Spatiotemporal Modeling of Macromolecular Systems in Cellular NeighborhoodsP41GM109824 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2014 to 2023
$18.8M
IMP: Software for Hybrid Determination of Macromolecular Assembly StructuresR01GM083960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 2008 to 2024
$5.2M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135990NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM109824NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive modeling of a whole cell requires an integration of vast amounts of information on various aspects of the cell and its parts. To divide and conquer this task, we introduce Bayesian metamodeling, a general approach to modeling complex systems by integrating a collection of heterogeneous input models. Each input model can in principle be based on any type of data and can describe a different aspect of the modeled system using any mathematical representation, scale, and level of granularity. These input models are 1) converted to a standardized statistical representation relying on probabilistic graphical models, 2) coupled by modeling their mutual relations with the physical world, and 3) finally harmonized with respect to each other. To illustrate Bayesian metamodeling, we provide a proof-of-principle metamodel of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by human pancreatic β-cells. The input models include a coarse-grained spatiotemporal simulation of insulin vesicle trafficking, docking, and exocytosis; a molecular network model of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion signaling; a network model of insulin metabolism; a structural model of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation; a linear model of a pancreatic cell population; and ordinary differential equations for systemic postprandial insulin response. Metamodeling benefits from decentralized computing, while often producing a more accurate, precise, and complete model that contextualizes input models as well as resolves conflicting information. We anticipate Bayesian metamodeling will facilitate collaborative science by providing a framework for sharing expertise, resources, data, and models, as exemplified by the Pancreatic β-Cell Consortium.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansLinear ModelsBayesian metamodelingintegrative modelingmultiscale modelingpancreatic β-cellwhole-cell modeling

Identifiers

PMID34453000
PMCPMC8536362

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.