ReviewNanoscale research letters2021
A Review on Biosensors and Nanosensors Application in Agroecosystems.
Review in Nanoscale research letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of nanosensors and nanomaterials to revolutionize the food industry: boosting product safety, quality, and sustainability.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Transforming soil decontamination: the role and prospects of nanotechnological remediation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- AI-driven routing and layered architectures for intelligent ICT in nanosensor networked systems.iScience · 2026Review
- Sustainable Integration of Nanobiosensors in Biomedical and Civil Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Nanobiosensors for revolutionizing parasitic infections diagnosis: a critical review to improve global health with an update on future challenges prospect.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Microbial enhanced oil recovery: process perspectives, challenges, and advanced technologies for its efficient applications and feasibility.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Trends of Nanobiosensors in Modern Agriculture Systems.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Advancing agriculture with functional NM: "pathways to sustainable and smart farming technologies".Discover nano · 2024Review
- Biosensors for Public Health and Environmental Monitoring: The Case for Sustainable Biosensing.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2024Review
- Revisiting the Role of Sensors for Shaping Plant Research: Applications and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Direct and indirect technical guide for the early detection and management of fungal plant diseases.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
- Aptamer-based technology for detecting Bacillus subtilis in soil.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Nanoparticle-mediated amelioration of drought stress in plants: a systematic review.3 Biotech · 2023Review
- Titanium biogenic nanoparticles to help the growth of Trichoderma harzianum to be used in biological control.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Article
- An update on pathogenesis and clinical scenario for Parkinson's disease: diagnosis and treatment.3 Biotech · 2023Review
- Advanced visual sensing techniques for on-site detection of pesticide residue in water environments.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Review
- Highly stable acetylcholinesterase electrochemical biosensor based on polymerized ionic liquids microgel for pesticides detection.Mikrochimica acta · 2022Article
- Recent development in functional nanomaterials for sustainable and smart agricultural chemical technologies.Nano convergence · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous decades have witnessed a lot of challenges that have provoked a dire need of ensuring global food security. The process of augmenting food production has made the agricultural ecosystems to face a lot of challenges like the persistence of residual particles of different pesticides, accretion of heavy metals, and contamination with toxic elemental particles which have negatively influenced the agricultural environment. The entry of such toxic elements into the human body via agricultural products engenders numerous health effects such as nerve and bone marrow disorders, metabolic disorders, infertility, disruption of biological functions at the cellular level, and respiratory and immunological diseases. The exigency for monitoring the agroecosystems can be appreciated by contemplating the reported 220,000 annual deaths due to toxic effects of residual pesticidal particles. The present practices employed for monitoring agroecosystems rely on techniques like gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, mass spectroscopy, etc. which have multiple constraints, being expensive, tedious with cumbersome protocol, demanding sophisticated appliances along with skilled personnel. The past couple of decades have witnessed a great expansion of the science of nanotechnology and this development has largely facilitated the development of modest, quick, and economically viable bio and nanosensors for detecting different entities contaminating the natural agroecosystems with an advantage of being innocuous to human health. The growth of nanotechnology has offered rapid development of bio and nanosensors for the detection of several composites which range from several metal ions, proteins, pesticides, to the detection of complete microorganisms. Therefore, the present review focuses on different bio and nanosensors employed for monitoring agricultural ecosystems and also trying to highlight the factor affecting their implementation from proof-of-concept to the commercialization stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.