Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34460019›Full record

ReviewNanoscale research letters2021

A Review on Biosensors and Nanosensors Application in Agroecosystems.

Pankaj Sharma, Vimal Pandey, Mayur Mukut Murlidhar Sharma, Anupam Patra, Baljinder Singh, Sahil Mehta, Azamal Husen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanoscale research letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Trends of Nanobiosensors in Modern Agriculture Systems.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Aptamer-based technology for detecting Bacillus subtilis in soil.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pankaj SharmaDepartment of Microbiology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Vimal PandeyNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-3888
Mayur Mukut Murlidhar SharmaDepartment of Agriculture and Life Industry, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Anupam PatraInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-2204
Baljinder SinghNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8316-450X
Sahil MehtaInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4407-7555
Azamal HusenWolaita Sodo University, P.O. Box: 138, Wolaita, Ethiopia. adroot92@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9120-5540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous decades have witnessed a lot of challenges that have provoked a dire need of ensuring global food security. The process of augmenting food production has made the agricultural ecosystems to face a lot of challenges like the persistence of residual particles of different pesticides, accretion of heavy metals, and contamination with toxic elemental particles which have negatively influenced the agricultural environment. The entry of such toxic elements into the human body via agricultural products engenders numerous health effects such as nerve and bone marrow disorders, metabolic disorders, infertility, disruption of biological functions at the cellular level, and respiratory and immunological diseases. The exigency for monitoring the agroecosystems can be appreciated by contemplating the reported 220,000 annual deaths due to toxic effects of residual pesticidal particles. The present practices employed for monitoring agroecosystems rely on techniques like gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, mass spectroscopy, etc. which have multiple constraints, being expensive, tedious with cumbersome protocol, demanding sophisticated appliances along with skilled personnel. The past couple of decades have witnessed a great expansion of the science of nanotechnology and this development has largely facilitated the development of modest, quick, and economically viable bio and nanosensors for detecting different entities contaminating the natural agroecosystems with an advantage of being innocuous to human health. The growth of nanotechnology has offered rapid development of bio and nanosensors for the detection of several composites which range from several metal ions, proteins, pesticides, to the detection of complete microorganisms. Therefore, the present review focuses on different bio and nanosensors employed for monitoring agricultural ecosystems and also trying to highlight the factor affecting their implementation from proof-of-concept to the commercialization stage.

Indexed as

Agricultural productionAgroecosystemsBiosensorsHeavy metalsNanoparticlesNanosensorsPathogensPesticides

Identifiers

PMID34460019
PMCPMC8405745

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.