Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34464400›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Unilateral vocal nerve resection alters neurogenesis in the avian song system in a region-specific manner.

Jake V Aronowitz, Alice Perez, Christopher O'Brien, Siaresh Aziz, Erica Rodriguez, Kobi Wasner, Sissi Ribeiro, Dovounnae Green, Farhana Faruk, Carolyn L Pytte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jake V AronowitzPsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2042-448X
Alice PerezPsychology Department, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States of America.
Christopher O'BrienPsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.
Siaresh AzizPsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.
Erica RodriguezPsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5966-714X
Kobi WasnerPsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.
Sissi RibeiroPsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3821-2458
Dovounnae GreenPsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.
Farhana FarukPsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.
Carolyn L PyttePsychology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2006-0532
Queens College, CUNY · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

MARC Undergraduate Student Training in Academic Research at Queens CollegeT34GM070387 · NIGMS · QUEENS COLLEGE · PI ZAKERI, ZAHRA · 2004 to 2021
$6.8M
Behavioral feedback and Neuronal LifespanR03NS063182 · NINDS · QUEENS COLLEGE · PI PYTTE, CAROLYN LIV · 2009 to 2010
$155k
NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM070387NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS063182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New neurons born in the adult brain undergo a critical period soon after migration to their site of incorporation. During this time, the behavior of the animal may influence the survival or culling of these cells. In the songbird song system, earlier work suggested that adult-born neurons may be retained in the song motor pathway nucleus HVC with respect to motor progression toward a target song during juvenile song learning, seasonal song restructuring, and experimentally manipulated song variability. However, it is not known whether the quality of song per se, without progressive improvement, may also influence new neuron survival. To test this idea, we experimentally altered song acoustic structure by unilateral denervation of the syrinx, causing a poor quality song. We found no effect of aberrant song on numbers of new neurons in HVC, suggesting that song quality does not influence new neuron culling in this region. However, aberrant song resulted in the loss of left-side dominance in new neurons in the auditory region caudomedial nidopallium (NCM), and a bilateral decrease in new neurons in the basal ganglia nucleus Area X. Thus new neuron culling may be influenced by behavioral feedback in accordance with the function of new neurons within that region. We propose that studying the effects of singing behaviors on new neurons across multiple brain regions that differentially subserve singing may give rise to general rules underlying the regulation of new neuron survival across taxa and brain regions more broadly.

Indexed as

GeographyNeurogenesisAgingAnimalsDoublecortin ProteinMaleNeuronsVocal CordsVocalization, AnimalDoublecortin Protein

Identifiers

PMID34464400
PMCPMC8407570
OpenAlexW3198842315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.