Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34464817›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2021

Homologous recombination within repetitive DNA.

Erica J Polleys, Catherine H Freudenreich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Recurrent DNA nicks drive massive expansions of (GAA)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Creation and resolution of non-B-DNA structural impediments during replication.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erica J PolleysDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford MA 02155, United States.
Catherine H FreudenreichDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford MA 02155, United States; Program in Genetics, Tufts University, Boston MA 02111, United States. Electronic address: catherine.freudenreich@tufts.edu.

Funding

Fork Restart at Replication Barriers and Effects on Genome StabilityR01GM122880 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI FREUDENREICH, CATHERINE H · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many microsatellite DNA sequences are able to form non-B form DNA secondary structures, such as hairpin loops, cruciforms, triplex DNA or G-quadruplexes. These DNA structures can form a significant impediment to DNA replication and repair, leading to DNA nicks, gaps, and breaks, which can be repaired by homologous recombination (HR). Recent work understanding HR at structure-forming repeats has focused on genetic requirements for replication fork restart, break induced replication (BIR) at broken forks, recombination during and after relocalization of breaks or stalled forks to the nuclear periphery, and how repair pathway choice and kinetics are navigated in the presence of a repeat tract. In this review, we summarize recent developments that illuminate the role of recombination in repairing DNA damage or causing tract length changes within repetitive DNA and its role in maintaining genome stability.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationHomologous RecombinationDNADNA DamageDNA RepairGenomic InstabilityHumansDNA

Identifiers

PMID34464817
PMCPMC8671197

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.