Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34465125›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Atrial Fibrillation in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Dijon Stroke Registry (2006-2017).

Amélie Gabet, Valérie Olié, Yannick Béjot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Intracerebral hemorrhage mortality in individuals with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide analysis of mortality trends in the United States.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amélie GabetSanté Publique France Saint-Maurice France.ORCID 0000-0003-1273-8988
Valérie OliéSanté Publique France Saint-Maurice France.ORCID 0000-0002-4837-1930
Yannick BéjotDijon Stroke Registry EA7460, Pathophysiology and Epidemiology of Cerebro-Cardiovascular diseases University Hospital of DijonUniversity of BurgundyUniversité Bourgogne-Franche-Comté (UBFC) Dijon France.ORCID 0000-0001-7848-7072
Santé Publique France · FRUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a major indication for oral anticoagulants (OAC) that contribute to spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This study evaluated AF prevalence among patients with ICH, temporal trends, and early functional outcomes and death of patients. Methods and Results Patients with first-ever ICH were prospectively recorded in the population-based stroke registry of Dijon, France, (2006-2017). Association between AF and early outcome of patients with ICH (ordinal modified Rankin Scale score and death at discharge) were analyzed using ordinal and logistic regressions. Among 444 patients with ICH, 97 (21.9%) had AF, including 65 (14.6%) with previously known AF treated with OAC, and 13 (2.9%) with newly diagnosed AF. AF prevalence rose from 17.2% (2006-2011) to 25.8% (2012-2017) (

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationCerebral HemorrhageStrokeAdministration, OralFranceHumansRegistriesRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsanticoagulantsatrial fibrillationepidemiologyintracerebral hemorrhageoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID34465125
PMCPMC8649297
OpenAlexW3197761391

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.