Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34475726›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2021

Development of an easy-to-use urease kit for detecting

Chularat Hlaoperm, Kiattawee Choowongkomon, Chantima Pruksakorn, Jatuporn Rattanasrisomporn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Indication and identification ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chularat HlaopermGraduate Program in Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Kiattawee ChoowongkomonDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Chantima PruksakornDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Jatuporn RattanasrisompornGraduate Program in Animal Health and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Kasetsart University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimMATERIALS AND

methodsThe RUT assays developed were prepared using 1% agar, 1% sodium phosphate monobasic, and 1% urea followed by the addition of 3% methyl red indicator. The cutoff value of sensitivity of the RUT assay was established using the urease of

resultsThe results showed that the developed assays were sensitive to the urease enzyme at 0.1 mg/mL. The lowest detection limit of this assay for

conclusionThe sensitivity of the developed assays allowed the detection of urease enzyme at a minimum concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. Our RUT could also detect

Indexed as

dogHelicobacter pylorirapid urease test

Identifiers

PMID34475726
PMCPMC8404113
OpenAlexW3187549885

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.