ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2022
The naked truth: a comprehensive clarification and classification of current 'myths' in naked mole-rat biology.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intrinsic anti-tumorigenic properties of the skin epithelium promote cancer resistance in naked mole-rats.iScience · 2026Article
- Age-dependent changes in lipid droplet distribution and vascularization in naked mole rat vs. mouse hippocampus.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Cryo-EM structure of the naked mole-rat ribosome reveals a stabilized split 28S rRNA.Nature communications · 2026Article
- ZooMonitor Community: A Tool for Evaluating Population-Level Behavior Questions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Could the naked mole-rat become the new standard for studying human gut health and probiotics?The Journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of naked mole-rat thermogenesis and its potential to maintain euthermia in response to cold.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Peaceful queen succession in the naked mole rat.Science advances · 2026Article
- Hypoxia Increases Cardiac Proteasomal Activity and Differentially Modulates Cullin-RING E3 Ligases in the Naked Mole-RatMuscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of acute and chronic hypoxia on the heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide pathway in naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber).The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the significance of dog domestication in cognitive dysfunction: Are wolves protected?Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Artemin sensitises mouse (Mus musculus) and naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) sensory neurons in vitro.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025Article
- Naked mole-rats employ a normoxic escape behaviour that is altered by social interaction.Biology letters · 2025Article
- CaCellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Severe acute hypoxia upregulates anaerobic metabolism in non-reproductive but not queen naked mole-rats.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Metabolic expenditure of submaximal locomotion in naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber) and Damaraland mole-rats (Fukomys damarensis).The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- African Mole-Rats May Have High Bone Conduction Sensitivity to Counterbalance Low Air Conduction Sensitivity.Audiology research · 2025Review
- Functional characterization of the store-operated calcium entry pathway in naked mole-rat cells.Open biology · 2025Article
- Illuminating the Shadows of Neuroscience: How Curiosity and Courage Redefine Research Models and Mentorship.eNeuro · 2025Article
- The evolution of division of labour: preconditions and evolutionary feedback.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
68 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) has fascinated zoologists for at least half a century. It has also generated considerable biomedical interest not only because of its extraordinary longevity, but also because of unusual protective features (e.g. its tolerance of variable oxygen availability), which may be pertinent to several human disease states, including ischemia/reperfusion injury and neurodegeneration. A recent article entitled 'Surprisingly long survival of premature conclusions about naked mole-rat biology' described 28 'myths' which, those authors claimed, are a 'perpetuation of beautiful, but falsified, hypotheses' and impede our understanding of this enigmatic mammal. Here, we re-examine each of these 'myths' based on evidence published in the scientific literature. Following Braude et al., we argue that these 'myths' fall into four main categories: (i) 'myths' that would be better described as oversimplifications, some of which persist solely in the popular press; (ii) 'myths' that are based on incomplete understanding, where more evidence is clearly needed; (iii) 'myths' where the accumulation of evidence over the years has led to a revision in interpretation, but where there is no significant disagreement among scientists currently working in the field; (iv) 'myths' where there is a genuine difference in opinion among active researchers, based on alternative interpretations of the available evidence. The term 'myth' is particularly inappropriate when applied to competing, evidence-based hypotheses, which form part of the normal evolution of scientific knowledge. Here, we provide a comprehensive critical review of naked mole-rat biology and attempt to clarify some of these misconceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.