Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34477909›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Automatic machine learning based on native T1 mapping can identify myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Wan-Lin Peng, Tian-Jing Zhang, Ke Shi, Hai-Xia Li, Ying Li, Sen He, Chen Li, Dong Xia, Chun-Chao Xia, Zhen-Lin Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Clincial Research Progress in Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wan-Lin PengDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tian-Jing ZhangPhilips Healthcare, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ke ShiDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hai-Xia LiPhilips Healthcare, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Electronic , Communication Engineering, School of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sen HeDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chen LiDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Dong XiaChengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chun-Chao XiaDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. xiachunchao@126.com.
Zhen-Lin LiDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. lzlcd01@126.com.
Sichuan University · CNPhilips (China) · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

1-3-5 project for disciplines of excellence of West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYGD18019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the feasibility of automatic machine learning (autoML) based on native T1 mapping to predict late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) status in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

methodsNinety-one HCM patients and 44 healthy controls who underwent cardiovascular MRI were enrolled. The native T1 maps of HCM patients were classified as LGE ( +) or LGE (-) based on location-matched LGE images. An autoML pipeline was implemented using the tree-based pipeline optimization tool (TPOT) for 3 binary classifications: LGE ( +) and LGE (-), LGE (-) and control, and HCM and control. TPOT modeling was repeated 10 times to obtain the optimal model for each classification. The diagnostic performance of the best models by slice and by case was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and microaveraged area under the curve (AUC).

resultsTen prediction models were generated by TPOT for each of the 3 binary classifications. The diagnostic accuracy obtained with the best pipeline in detecting LGE status in the testing cohort of HCM patients was 0.80 by slice and 0.79 by case. In addition, the TPOT model also showed discriminability between LGE (-) patients and control (accuracy: 0.77 by slice; 0.78 by case) and for all HCM patients and controls (accuracy: 0.88 for both).

conclusionsNative T1 map analysis based on autoML correlates with LGE ( +) or (-) status. The TPOT machine learning algorithm could be a promising method for predicting myocardial fibrosis, as reflected by the presence of LGE in HCM patients without the need for late contrast-enhanced MRI sequences. KEY POINTS: • The tree-based pipeline optimization tool (TPOT) is a machine learning algorithm that could help predict late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) status in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. • The TPOT could serve as an adjuvant method to detect LGE by using information from native T1 maps, thus avoiding the need for contrast agent. • The TPOT also detects native T1 map alterations in LGE-negative patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicContrast MediaFibrosisGadoliniumHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardiumContrast MediaGadoliniumCardiomyopathy, hypertrophyFibrosisMachine learningMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34477909
OpenAlexW3196452975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.