ArticleEpigenetics2022
DNA methylome-based validation of induced sputum as an effective protocol to study lung immunity: construction of a classifier of pulmonary cell types.
Article in Epigenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- methylR: a graphical interface for comprehensive DNA methylation array data analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- The spectrum of tuberculosis described as differential DNA methylation patterns in alveolar macrophages and alveolar T cells.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Article
- Cell-type heterogeneity: Why we should adjust for it in epigenome and biomarker studies.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Article
- A differential DNA methylome signature of pulmonary immune cells from individuals converting to latent tuberculosis infection.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flow cytometry is a classical approach used to define cell types in peripheral blood. While DNA methylation signatures have been extensively employed in recent years as an alternative to flow cytometry to define cell populations in peripheral blood, this approach has not been tested in lung-derived samples. Here, we compared bronchoalveolar lavage with a more cost-effective and less invasive technique based on sputum induction and developed a DNA methylome-based algorithm that can be used to deconvolute the cell types in such samples. We analysed the DNA methylome profiles of alveolar macrophages and lymphocytes cells isolated from the pulmonary compartment. The cells were isolated using two different methods, sputum induction and bronchoalveolar lavage. A strong positive correlation between the DNA methylome profiles of cells obtained with the two isolation methods was found. We observed the best correlation of the DNA methylomes when both isolation methods captured cells from the lower parts of the lungs. We also identified unique patterns of CpG methylation in DNA obtained from the two cell populations, which can be used as a signature to discriminate between the alveolar macrophages and lymphocytes by means of open-source algorithms. We validated our findings with external data and obtained results consistent with the previous findings. Our analysis opens up a new possibility to identify different cell populations from lung samples and promotes sputum induction as a tool to study immune cell populations from the lung.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.