Evidence mapPaperPMID 34497828Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in surgery2021

Single-Incision vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: An Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ye Yuan, Jianing Jian, Hailiang Jing, Ran Yan, Fengming You, Xi Fu, Linke Du, Wenyuan Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical and pathological outcomes.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ye YuanHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Jianing JianHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Hailiang JingHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Ran YanHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Fengming YouHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xi FuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Linke DuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Wenyuan LiHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerconventional laparoscopic surgerymeta-analysisrandomized controlled trialssingle-incision laparoscopic surgerysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34497828
PMCPMC8419430
OpenAlexW3194610337

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.