Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34499649›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy and relevance of a novel ELISA system developed for seroepidemiologic surveys of Helicobacter pylori infection in African settings.

Evariste Tshibangu-Kabamba, Bui Hoang Phuc, Vo Phuoc Tuan, Kartika Afrida Fauzia, Augustin Kabongo-Tshibaka, Nadine Kalenda Kayiba, Angel Rosas-Aguirre, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Alain Cimuanga-Mukanya, Patrick de Jésus Ngoma Kisoko and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Epidemiology ofPeerJ · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Evariste Tshibangu-KabambaDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4339-229X
Bui Hoang PhucDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4499-5911
Vo Phuoc TuanDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-1367
Kartika Afrida FauziaDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-3270
Augustin Kabongo-TshibakaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mbujimayi, Mbujimayi, DR Congo.ORCID 0000-0001-9519-5653
Nadine Kalenda KayibaResearch Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholoique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5557-304X
Angel Rosas-AguirreResearch Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholoique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3271-7028
Brecht DevleesschauwerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2867-6892
Alain Cimuanga-MukanyaDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9255-3627
Patrick de Jésus Ngoma KisokoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DR Congo.ORCID 0000-0003-4945-6941
Takashi MatsumotoDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Junko AkadaDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Ghislain Tumba DisashiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mbujimayi, Mbujimayi, DR Congo.
Dieudonné Mumba NgoyiDepartment of Parasitology, National Institute of Biomedical Research, Kinshasa, DR Congo.ORCID 0000-0002-5886-2004
Yasutoshi KidoDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3615-2631
Niko SpeybroeckResearch Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholoique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3322-3502
Yoshio YamaokaDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1222-5819
Oita University · JPUniversity of Mbuji Mayi · CDUCLouvain · BEBaylor College of Medicine · USGhent University · BENational Institute of Biomedical Research · CDUniversity of Kinshasa · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beside diagnostic uncertainties due to the lack of a perfect gold standard test for Helicobacter pylori infection, the diagnosis and the prevalence estimation for this infection encounter particular challenges in Africa including limited diagnostic tools and specific genetic background. We developed and evaluated the accuracy of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system tailored for H. pylori genetics in Africa (HpAfr-ELISA). Strains belonging to main genetic populations infecting Africans were exploited as sources for whole-cell antigens to establish in-house the ELISA system. A phase II unmatched case-control study explored the diagnostic accuracy of the HpAfr-ELISA using a training set of samples collected from dyspeptic patients from Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) who had been tested with invasive standard tests (i.e., histology, culture, and rapid urease test) in 2017. Then the assay was cross-validated through a community-based survey assessing the prevalence of H. pylori and associated factors in 425 adults from Mbujimayi, DRC in 2018. Bayesian inferences were used to deal with statistical uncertainties of estimates (true prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity) in the study population. At its optimal cut-off-value 20.2 U/mL, the assay achieved an estimated sensitivity of 97.6% (95% credible interval [95%CrI]: 89.2; 99.9%) and specificity of 90.5% (95%CrI: 78.6; 98.5). Consistent outcomes obtained at repeated tests attested the robustness of the assay (negative and positive agreements always > 70%). The true prevalence of H. pylori was estimated 53.8% [95%CrI: 42.8; 62.7%]. Increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] > 1.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): > 1.0; 1.1]; p<0.001), overcrowding households (aOR = 3.2 [95%CI: 2.0; 5.1]; p<0.001), and non-optimal hand hygiene (aOR = 4.5 [95%CI: 2.0; 11.4]; p = 0.001) were independently associated with the H. pylori-seropositivity. The novel ELISA system has demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy and potential usefulness for management and mitigation strategies for H. pylori infection in African settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfricaAgedChildChild, PreschoolEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34499649
PMCPMC8455143
OpenAlexW3197762395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.