Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34501533›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Parental Preconception Exposures to Outdoor Neighbourhood Environments and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Protocol for a Scoping Review and Evidence Map.

Suzanne Mavoa, Daniel Keevers, Stefan C Kane, Melissa Wake, Rachel Tham, Kate Lycett, Yen Ting Wong, Katherine Chong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suzanne MavoaMelbourne School of Population & Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6071-2988
Daniel KeeversMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Stefan C KaneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5172-3263
Melissa WakeMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Rachel ThamMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9362-5189
Kate LycettMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Yen Ting WongIMPACT Institute, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia.
Katherine ChongIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2M7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parental preconception exposures to built and natural outdoor environments could influence pregnancy and birth outcomes either directly, or via a range of health-related behaviours and conditions. However, there is no existing review summarising the evidence linking natural and built characteristics, such as air and noise pollution, walkability, greenness with pregnancy and birth outcomes. Therefore, the planned scoping review aims to collate and map the published literature on parental preconception exposures to built and natural outdoor environments and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus) to identify studies for inclusion. Studies will be included if they empirically assess the relationship between maternal and paternal preconception exposures to physical natural and built environment features that occur outdoors in the residential neighbourhood and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and then the full text. Data extraction and assessment of study quality will be performed by one researcher and checked by a second researcher. Results will be summarised in a narrative synthesis, with additional summaries presented as tables and figures. The scoping review will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication, at academic conferences, and published on a website.

Indexed as

ParturitionResidence CharacteristicsDelivery of Health CareEnvironmentFemaleHumansNoisePregnancyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicbirth outcomesbuilt environmentnatural environmentpreconceptionpregnancy outcomesscoping review protocol

Identifiers

PMID34501533
PMCPMC8431720

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.