Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34502366›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Immunotoxicity of Xenobiotics in Fish: A Role for the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR)?

Helmut Segner, Christyn Bailey, Carolina Tafalla, Jun Bo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Investigating Immunotoxicity in Black Carp (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insights into ToxicToxins · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing Fish Immunotoxicity by Means ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  15. Targeting AhR as a Novel Therapeutic Modality against Inflammatory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helmut SegnerCentre for Fish and Wildlife Health, Department of Pathobiology and Infectious Diseases, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1783-1295
Christyn BaileyFish Immunology Group, CISA-INIA, 28130 Madrid, Spain.
Carolina TafallaFish Immunology Group, CISA-INIA, 28130 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0860-2976
Jun BoLaboratory of Marine Biology and Ecology, Third Institute of Oceanography, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-1654
Fujian Institute of Oceanography · CNUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China number 4197721Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030E-164266, 31003A_153427, and 31003A_130640 to HS, P400PB_183824 to CB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of anthropogenic contaminants on the immune system of fishes is an issue of growing concern. An important xenobiotic receptor that mediates effects of chemicals, such as halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs) and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), is the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Fish toxicological research has focused on the role of this receptor in xenobiotic biotransformation as well as in causing developmental, cardiac, and reproductive toxicity. However, biomedical research has unraveled an important physiological role of the AhR in the immune system, what suggests that this receptor could be involved in immunotoxic effects of environmental contaminants. The aims of the present review are to critically discuss the available knowledge on (i) the expression and possible function of the AhR in the immune systems of teleost fishes; and (ii) the impact of AhR-activating xenobiotics on the immune systems of fish at the levels of immune gene expression, immune cell proliferation and immune cell function, immune pathology, and resistance to infectious disease. The existing information indicates that the AhR is expressed in the fish immune system, but currently, we have little understanding of its physiological role. Exposure to AhR-activating contaminants results in the modulation of numerous immune structural and functional parameters of fish. Despite the diversity of fish species studied and the experimental conditions investigated, the published findings rather uniformly point to immunosuppressive actions of xenobiotic AhR ligands in fish. These effects are often associated with increased disease susceptibility. The fact that fish populations from HAH- and PAH-contaminated environments suffer immune disturbances and elevated disease susceptibility highlights that the immunotoxic effects of AhR-activating xenobiotics bear environmental relevance.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionFishesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, HalogenatedPolychlorinated DibenzodioxinsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonXenobioticsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, HalogenatedPolychlorinated DibenzodioxinsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonXenobioticsaryl hydrocarbon receptordiseaseenvironmental pollutionfishhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbonsimmunityimmunotoxicitypolyaromatic hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID34502366
PMCPMC8430475
OpenAlexW3197005082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.