Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34503144›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Liquid Biopsy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Opportunities and Challenges for Immunotherapy.

Panagiota Maravelia, Daniela Nascimento Silva, Giulia Rovesti, Michael Chrobok, Per Stål, Yong-Chen Lu, Anna Pasetto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of methylatedFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. European Society for Organ Transplantation Consensus Statement on Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Panagiota MaraveliaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniela Nascimento SilvaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden.
Giulia RovestiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2761-9482
Michael ChrobokDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden.
Per StålUnit of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine/Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Upper GI Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden.
Yong-Chen LuDepartment of Pathology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0275-9825
Anna PasettoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5254-2173
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest cancer types worldwide. HCC is often diagnosed at a late stage when the therapeutic options are very limited. However, even at the earlier stages, the best treatment is liver transplantation, surgical resection or ablation. Surgical resection and ablation may carry a high risk of tumor recurrence. The recent introduction of immunotherapies resulted in clinical responses for a subgroup of patients, but there were still no effective predictive markers for response to immunotherapy or for recurrence after surgical therapy. The identification of biomarkers that could correlate and predict response or recurrence would require close monitoring of the patients throughout and after the completion of treatment. However, this would not be performed efficiently by repeated and invasive tissue biopsies. A better approach would be to use liquid biopsies including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating RNA (e.g., microRNAs), circulating tumor cells (CTC) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) (e.g., exosomes) for disease monitoring in a non-invasive manner. In this review, we discuss the currently available technology that can enable the use of liquid biopsy as a diagnostic and prognostic tool. Moreover, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of the clinical application of liquid biopsy for immunotherapy of HCC.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cells (CTC)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)immunotherapiesliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34503144
PMCPMC8431414
OpenAlexW3197803929

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.