Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34505575›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Little evidence that Eurasian jays protect their caches by responding to cues about a conspecific's desire and visual perspective.

Piero Amodio, Benjamin G Farrar, Christopher Krupenye, Ljerka Ostojić, Nicola S Clayton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Piero AmodioDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9408-2902
Benjamin G FarrarDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Christopher KrupenyeDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2029-1872
Ljerka OstojićDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8008-1773
Nicola S ClaytonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1835-423X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011194/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eurasian jays have been reported to protect their caches by responding to cues about either the visual perspective or current desire of an observing conspecific, similarly to other corvids. Here, we used established paradigms to test whether these birds can - like humans - integrate multiple cues about different mental states and perform an optimal response accordingly. Across five experiments, which also include replications of previous work, we found little evidence that our jays adjusted their caching behaviour in line with the visual perspective and current desire of another agent, neither by integrating these social cues nor by responding to only one type of cue independently. These results raise questions about the reliability of the previously reported effects and highlight several key issues affecting reliability in comparative cognition research.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsCuesFoodPasseriformescorvidsdesiresecologyEurasian jayperspectivereplicationtheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID34505575
PMCPMC8536255

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.