ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021
Application of High-Resolution Flat Detector Computed Tomography in Stent Implantation for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploratory analysis of morphology-hemodynamics-perfusion relationships after intracranial stenting in severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Incomplete Stent Apposition in Intracranial Aneurysms Using Optical Coherence Tomography: a Porcine Model Study.Translational stroke research · 2025Article
- High-Resolution C-arm Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Stent Expansion and Apposition after Intracranial Stent Implantation.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025Article
- Safety and Efficacy of LVIS Jr Stent-assisted Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms in Small-diameter Parent Arteries : A Single-center Experience.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
- One-step solution for angioplasty, low-profile stent delivery, and intrastent dilation using a dual-lumen angioplasty balloon microcatheter: technical advances, limitations, outcomes, and literature review.Neurosurgical review · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the utility of high-resolution flat-detector computed tomography (HR-FDCT) compared with conventional flat-detector computed tomography (FDCT) for stent placement in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 116 patients with symptomatic ICAS who underwent stent implantation. Images were acquired using conventional FDCT [voxel size = 0.43 mm (isotropic)] and HR-FDCT [voxel size = 0.15 mm (isotropic)]. Immediately after stent deployment, dual-volume three-dimensional (3D) fusion images were obtained from 3D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and HR-FDCT. The image quality for stent visualization was graded from 0 to 2 (0: not able to assess; 1: limited, but able to assess; 2: clear visualization), and the stent-expansion status ("full," "under-expanded" or "poor apposition") was recorded.
resultsA total of 116 patients with symptomatic ICAS were treated successfully using 116 stents (58 Neuroform
conclusionHigh-resolution flat-detector computed tomography (HR-FDCT) improves visualization of the fine structures of intracranial stents deployed for symptomatic ICAS compared with that visualized using conventional FDCT. High-resolution flat-detector computed tomography improves assessment of stent deployment and could reduce the risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.