Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514420›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2021

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies.

Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Mark E Nunnally, Judith Hellman, Ishaq Lat, Greg S Martin, Sameer Jog, Jozef Kesecioglu, Daniel De Backer, Craig M Coopersmith

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Use of Sustained Low-efficiency Dialysis in the Treatment of Sepsis-associated Acute Kidney Injury in a Low-income Country: A Prospective Cohort Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Hemoperfusion: technical aspects and state of the art.Critical care (London, England) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Ignacio Martin-LoechesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mark E NunnallyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Judith HellmanDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, CA.
Ishaq LatShirley Ryan Abilitylab, Chicago, IL.
Greg S MartinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Sameer JogDepartment of Critical Care, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Maharashtra, India.
Jozef KeseciogluDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Daniel De BackerDepartment of Intensive Care, Chirec Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Craig M CoopersmithDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
NYU Langone Health · USUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with infection can develop sepsis, and their mortality can be high. An important aspect in the treatment of sepsis is adequate management of the infection. DATA SOURCES: Using a modified Delphi approach, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign research committee recently published a series of 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. STUDY SELECTION: Task force members with specific expertise were tasked with generating expanded reviews for all infection questions and a subset of adjunctive therapy questions from the larger list of sepsis priorities. Each question was addressed by one of the six task force members. DATA EXTRACTION: In-depth reviews were then edited by the group as a whole, with added input from the committee cochairs. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six questions were addressed: 1) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock? 2) does optimization of antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics impact patient outcomes in sepsis? 3) should viral reactivation resulting from sepsis-induced immunosuppression be treated with antiviral therapy in critically ill septic patients? 4) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice? 5) what is the role of lung-protective ventilation in sepsis patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome? and 6) how do we determine the efficacy of "blood purification" therapies such as endotoxin absorbers, cytokine absorbers, and plasmapheresis.

conclusionsThe research committee members for the Surviving Sepsis Campaign aimed to explore research questions in order to provide existing evidence and highlight areas of uncertainty and future directions.

Indexed as

infectionintensive care unitsepsisseptic shockventilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID34514420
PMCPMC8425836
OpenAlexW3198424498

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.