Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34514768›Full record

ReviewPediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism2021

C-peptide and residual β-cell function in pediatric diabetes - state of the art.

Milena Jamiołkowska-Sztabkowska, Barbara Głowińska-Olszewska, Artur Bossowski

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Characterization of human placental fetal vessels in gestational diabetes mellitus.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Computational Analysis of Deleterious nsSNPs inJournal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Milena Jamiołkowska-SztabkowskaDepartment of Pediatrics, Endocrinology, Diabetology with Cardiology Division, Medical University of Białystok, Polska.
Barbara Głowińska-OlszewskaDepartment of Pediatrics, Endocrinology, Diabetology with Cardiology Division, Medical University of Białystok, Polska.
Artur BossowskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Endocrinology, Diabetology with Cardiology Division, Medical University of Białystok, Polska.
Pediatrics and Genetics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C-peptide, the molecule produced in an equimolar concentration to insulin, has become an established insulin secretion biomarker in diabetic patients. Measurement of C-peptide level can be helpful in clinical practice for assessing insulin-producing b-cells residual function, especially in the patients who have already started exogenous insulin therapy. Advances in assays have made measurement of C-peptide more reliable and inexpensive. Traditionally, C-peptide is widely used to differentiate between type 1, type 2 and monogenic types in diabetic patients of all ages, both when the diabetes occurs and even months and years after the initial diagnosis. Moreover, in the patients with type 1 diabetes, the C-peptide secretion can become a reliable predictor of the clinical partial remission in the first months after diagnosis, although noteworthy, its' any specified level is not included in the definition of this phase of the disease. Many other clinical factors such as age, use of innovative technologies, the intensity of physical activity or body mass influence the concentration of C-peptide as well as diabetes remission occurrence and duration. They may interfere the interpretation of C-peptide level in the diabetes course. There is a great need to assess the new, adjusted C-peptide levels in these situations. A multitude novel therapies including immunomodulative factors and stem cell transplants can also use C-peptide in the patient selection and post-therapeutic monitoring of the outcome in researches aimed in extension of remission period. Recent research proves C-peptide presence and preserved function and being the possible important player in better metabolic control in long-lasting diabetes type 1. These findings may open the area for trials to regenerate b-cells and save endogenous insulin secretion for many years after diagnosis. Last but not the least, C-peptide presents its own physiological effect on other tissues, among others on the endothelial function, thus participates in inhibiting micro- and macrovascular diabetes complications. The idea of C-peptide as a new, additional to insulin cure remains as much attractive as elusive.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1InsulinBiomarkersChildC-PeptideHumansInsulin SecretionBiomarkersC-PeptideInsulinC-peptidepartial remissionresidual insulin secretion.type 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34514768
PMCPMC10214969
OpenAlexW3176202208

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.