Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34517907›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2021

Chilean validation of the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis-structure questionnaire (OPD-SQ) for personality structure.

Nicolás Lorenzini, G de la Parra, P Dagnino, E Gomez-Barris, C Crempien, J C Ehrenthal

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolás LorenziniPsychoanalysis Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
G de la ParraDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile. gdelaparra@uc.cl.
P DagninoMillenium Institute for Research on Depression and Personality - MIDAP, Santiago, Chile.
E Gomez-BarrisDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.
C CrempienMillenium Institute for Research on Depression and Personality - MIDAP, Santiago, Chile.
J C EhrenthalUniversity of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is the validation of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ).

methodsA clinical sample of 399 adults and a nonclinical general population sample of 50 healthy adults completed measures of depression, attachment, psychiatric symptomatology and distress. Internal consistency and concurrent validity were assessed. Test-retest and Reliable Change Index were also calculated, as was the ability of the OPD-SQ to distinguish between the clinical and general population groups.

resultsHigh internal consistencies were found; significant differences between clinical and nonclinical samples, and significant associations with psychiatric symptomatology, depression and psychological distress.

conclusionThe Chilean OPD-SQ has good reliability, and discriminates between clinical and healthy samples.

Indexed as

PersonalityPersonality DisordersAdultHealth StatusHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesOperationalized psychodynamic diagnosisPersonality structurePsychodynamicSelf-report

Identifiers

PMID34517907
PMCPMC8436439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.