Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518528›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is vulnerable to moderate electric fields.

Claudia R Arbeitman, Pablo Rojas, Pedro Ojeda-May, Martin E Garcia

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Claudia R Arbeitman *Theoretical Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Nanostructure Science and Technology, FB10, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8302-6825
Pablo Rojas *Theoretical Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Nanostructure Science and Technology, FB10, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3692-9228
Pedro Ojeda-MayHigh Performance Computing Center North (HPC2N), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Martin E GarciaTheoretical Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Nanostructure Science and Technology, FB10, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Germany. m.garcia@uni-kassel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2418-1902
University of Kassel · DEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the ongoing projects aimed at the development of specific therapies and vaccines against COVID-19 use the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein as the main target. The binding of the spike protein with the ACE2 receptor (ACE2) of the host cell constitutes the first and key step for virus entry. During this process, the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the S protein plays an essential role, since it contains the receptor binding motif (RBM), responsible for the docking to the receptor. So far, mostly biochemical methods are being tested in order to prevent binding of the virus to ACE2. Here we show, with the help of atomistic simulations, that external electric fields of easily achievable and moderate strengths can dramatically destabilise the S protein, inducing long-lasting structural damage. One striking field-induced conformational change occurs at the level of the recognition loop L3 of the RBD where two parallel beta sheets, believed to be responsible for a high affinity to ACE2, undergo a change into an unstructured coil, which exhibits almost no binding possibilities to the ACE2 receptor. We also show that these severe structural changes upon electric-field application also occur in the mutant RBDs corresponding to the variants of concern (VOC) B.1.1.7 (UK), B.1.351 (South Africa) and P.1 (Brazil). Remarkably, while the structural flexibility of S allows the virus to improve its probability of entering the cell, it is also the origin of the surprising vulnerability of S upon application of electric fields of strengths at least two orders of magnitude smaller than those required for damaging most proteins. Our findings suggest the existence of a clean physical method to weaken the SARS-CoV-2 virus without further biochemical processing. Moreover, the effect could be used for infection prevention purposes and also to develop technologies for in-vitro structural manipulation of S. Since the method is largely unspecific, it can be suitable for application to other mutations in S, to other proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and in general to membrane proteins of other virus types.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Binding SitesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Conformation, beta-StrandReceptors, VirusSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVirus InternalizationACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2COVID-19 VaccinesReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34518528
PMCPMC8437970
OpenAlexW3137629645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.