Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34518632›Full record

SynthesisModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) versus pseudo-IPMNs: relative frequency, clinicopathologic characteristics and differential diagnosis.

Takashi Muraki, Kee-Taek Jang, Michelle D Reid, Burcin Pehlivanoglu, Bahar Memis, Olca Basturk, Pardeep Mittal, David Kooby, Shishir K Maithel, Juan M Sarmiento and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07709052 (Predictive Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07709052 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Predictive Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Specializzata in Gastroenterologia Saverio de BellisRan2026 to 2028Enrolled180ConditionsPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of Pancreas, Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PanIN or IPMN? Redefining Lesion Size in 3 Dimensions.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Takashi MurakiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kee-Taek JangDepartment of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7987-4437
Michelle D ReidDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Burcin PehlivanogluDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bahar MemisDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Olca BasturkDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2747-1366
Pardeep MittalDepartment of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David KoobyDepartment of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shishir K MaithelDepartment of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Juan M SarmientoDepartment of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kathleen ChristiansDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA.
Susan TsaiDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA.
Douglas EvansDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA.
Volkan AdsayDepartment of Pathology, Koç University Hospital and Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey. vadsay@kuh.ku.edu.tr.
Emory University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USKoç University · TRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature is highly conflicted on what percentage of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) arise in association with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). Some studies have claimed that even small (Sendai-negative) IPMNs frequently lead to PDAC. Recently, more refined pathologic definitions for mucin-lined cysts were provided in consensus manuscripts, but so far there is no systematic analysis regarding the frequency and clinicopathologic characteristics of IPMN-mimickers, i.e., pseudo-IPMNs. In this study, as the first step in establishing frequency, we performed a systematic review of the pathologic findings in 501 consecutive ordinary PDACs, which disclosed that 10% of PDACs had associated cysts ≥1 cm. While 31 (6.2%) of these were IPMN or mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), 19 (3.8%) were other cyst types that mimicked IPMN (pseudo-IPMNs) per recent WHO/consensus criteria. As the second step of the study, we performed a comparative clinicopathologic analysis by also including our entire surgical pathology/consultation databases that was comprised of 60 IPMN-associated PDACs, 30 MCN-associated PDACs and 40 pseudo-IPMN-associated PDACs. We found that 84% of true IPMNs were pre-operatively recognized, whereas IPMN was considered in differential diagnosis of 33% of pseudo-IPMNs. Of the 40 pseudo-IPMNs, there were 15 secondary duct ectasias; 6 large-duct-type PDACs; 5 pseudocysts; 5 cystic tumor necrosis; 4 simple mucinous cysts; 3 groove pancreatitis-associated paraduodenal wall cysts; and 2 congenital cysts. Microscopically, pseudo-IPMNs had at least partial mucinous-lining mimicking IPMN but had smaller cystic (mean = 1.9 cm) and larger PDAC (mean = 3.8 cm) components compared to true IPMNs (cyst = 5.7 cm; PDAC = 2.0 cm). In summary, in this pathologically verified analysis that utilized refined criteria, 10% of PDACs were discovered to have cysts ≥1 cm, about two-thirds of which were IPMN/MCN but about one-third were pseudo-IPMNs. True IPMNs underlying the PDACs are often large and are already diagnosed pre-operatively as having an IPMN component, whereas only a third of the pseudo-IPMNs receive IPMN diagnosis by imaging and their cysts are smaller. At the histopathologic level, pseudo-IPMNs are highly prone to misdiagnosis as IPMN, which presumably accounts for much higher association of IPMNs with PDAC as reported in some studies. The subtle but salient characteristics of pseudo-IPMNs elucidated in this study should be combined with careful radiological/clinical correlation in order to exclude pseudo-IPMNs.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34518632
OpenAlexW3200743908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.