Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34519874›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2021

Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus.

Clara Montgomery, Jozsef Vuts, Christine M Woodcock, David M Withall, Michael A Birkett, John A Pickett, Daniel Robert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Electrostatics facilitate midair host attachment in parasitic jumping nematodes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Electrostatic pollination by butterflies and moths.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clara MontgomerySchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK. cmontgomery@harper-adams.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-4383
Jozsef VutsDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Christine M WoodcockDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.
David M WithallDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Michael A BirkettDepartment of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.
John A PickettSchool of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK.
Daniel RobertSchool of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011143/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T003235/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timing of volatile organic compound (VOC) emission by flowering plants often coincides with pollinator foraging activity. Volatile emission is often considered to be paced by environmental variables, such as light intensity, and/or by circadian rhythmicity. The question arises as to what extent pollinators themselves provide information about their presence, in keeping with their long co-evolution with flowering plants. Bumblebees are electrically charged and provide electrical stimulation when visiting plants, as measured via the depolarisation of electric potential in the stem of flowers. Here we test the hypothesis that the electric charge of foraging bumblebees increases the floral volatile emissions of bee pollinated plants. We investigate the change in VOC emissions of two bee-pollinated plants (Petunia integrifolia and Antirrhinum majus) exposed to the electric charge typical of foraging bumblebees. P. integrifolia slightly increases its emissions of a behaviorally and physiologically active compound in response to visits by foraging bumblebees, presenting on average 121 pC of electric charge. We show that for P. integrifolia, strong electrical stimulation (600-700 pC) promotes increased volatile emissions, but this is not found when using weaker electrical charges more representative of flying pollinators (100 pC). Floral volatile emissions of A. majus were not affected by either strong (600-700 pC) or weak electric charges (100 pC). This study opens a new area of research whereby the electrical charge of flying insects may provide information to plants on the presence and phenology of their pollinators. As a form of electroreception, this sensory process would bear adaptive value, enabling plants to better ensure that their attractive chemical messages are released when a potential recipient is present.

Indexed as

AntirrhinumPetuniaVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsBeesFlowersPollinationVolatile Organic CompoundsPlant,Pollination,Scent,Signaling,Triboelectricity

Identifiers

PMID34519874
PMCPMC8440258

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.