Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34520076›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2021

Comparison of six assessment tools to screen for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with hypertension.

Zhenzhen Zheng, Xishi Sun, Riken Chen, Wei Lei, Min Peng, Xiongbin Li, Nuofu Zhang, Junfen Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenzhen ZhengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xishi SunDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Riken ChenGuangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei LeiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Min PengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xiongbin LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Nuofu ZhangGuangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Junfen ChengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Special Fund of Guangdong ProvinceSpecial Project for Major Science and Technology Innovation Platform and Project Introduction 2019A201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is often accompanied by other complications, especially hypertension. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to compare the application value of six tools in the screening of OSA in patients with hypertension. Compared with other questionnaires, we hypothesized that Berlin performed better in screening hypertensive patients suspected of OSA.

methodsIn this study, we collected the basic data and polysomnography (PSG) data of patients diagnosed with hypertension who underwent PSG at the Sleep Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from April 2012 to March 2021. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, area under the curv (AUC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the six screening tools were then calculated, and their correlation with the sleep apnea hypopnea index (AHI) analyzed.

resultsThere were 303 males (303/398, 76.1%) out of 398 hypertension patients suspected of OSA. The area under the curve of the Berlin questionnaire's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve reached 0.753 (95%CI: 0.707-0.794). When the AHI was 5, 15 and 30 times/h as the cut-off points, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of Berlin were the highest at 0.947 and 0.630, 0.970 and 0.851, and 0.988 and 0.957 respectively, while the specificity and positive predictive value of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were the highest at 0.696 and 0.729, 0.750 and 0.887, and 0.674 and 0.575 respectively. The DOR value of the Berlin questionnaire could reach 18.333 when the AHI cut-off point was 30 times/h. Berlin had the largest rank correlation coefficient with AHI at 0.466.

conclusionThe Berlin questionnaire can be considered a priority for the screening and stratifying of hypertensive patients suspected of OSA.

Indexed as

HypertensionSleep Apnea, ObstructiveHumansMaleMass ScreeningPolysomnographySurveys and QuestionnairesBerlin questionnaireESS sleepiness scalehypertensionno-apnea scoreNoSAS scoreobstructive sleep apneaSTOP-bang questionnaireSTOP questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID34520076
PMCPMC8571550
OpenAlexW3199221722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.