ArticleClinical cardiology2021
Comparison of six assessment tools to screen for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with hypertension.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The No-Apnea score for early obstructive sleep apnea detection in a sleep clinic: a study of diagnostic accuracy and comparative performance of three screening instruments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of five questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea screening in the elderly.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Risk Assessment in Hypertension: Development of a Predictive Nomogram in China.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- Prevalence, treatment and determinants of obstructive sleep apnoea and its symptoms in a population-based French cohort.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- A portrait of obstructive sleep apnea risk factors in 27,210 middle-aged and older adults in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Validation of GOAL questionnaire as screening tool for clinical obstructive sleep apnea: A large sample study in China.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- A Prediction Nomogram Combining Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Other Clinical Parameters to Predict Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Hypertension.International journal of hypertension · 2022Article
- Application value of joint STOP-Bang questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale in screening for obstructive sleep apnea.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Comparison of six assessment tools to screen for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with hypertension.Clinical cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is often accompanied by other complications, especially hypertension. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to compare the application value of six tools in the screening of OSA in patients with hypertension. Compared with other questionnaires, we hypothesized that Berlin performed better in screening hypertensive patients suspected of OSA.
methodsIn this study, we collected the basic data and polysomnography (PSG) data of patients diagnosed with hypertension who underwent PSG at the Sleep Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from April 2012 to March 2021. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, area under the curv (AUC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the six screening tools were then calculated, and their correlation with the sleep apnea hypopnea index (AHI) analyzed.
resultsThere were 303 males (303/398, 76.1%) out of 398 hypertension patients suspected of OSA. The area under the curve of the Berlin questionnaire's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve reached 0.753 (95%CI: 0.707-0.794). When the AHI was 5, 15 and 30 times/h as the cut-off points, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of Berlin were the highest at 0.947 and 0.630, 0.970 and 0.851, and 0.988 and 0.957 respectively, while the specificity and positive predictive value of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were the highest at 0.696 and 0.729, 0.750 and 0.887, and 0.674 and 0.575 respectively. The DOR value of the Berlin questionnaire could reach 18.333 when the AHI cut-off point was 30 times/h. Berlin had the largest rank correlation coefficient with AHI at 0.466.
conclusionThe Berlin questionnaire can be considered a priority for the screening and stratifying of hypertensive patients suspected of OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.