Observational studyJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2022
Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Genetic Insights from EXPLORE-J.
Observational study in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome according to the Current Japanese Guidelines: Insight from the EXPLORE-J study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Observational
- Prevalence and penetrance of pathogenic and likely pathogenicFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Exploration Continues.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- Improved Efficiency of the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Children: A Comparison of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines of 2017 and 2022.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2024Article
- Validation of the 2022 Clinical Diagnostic Criteria of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Japan.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2024Article
- Gaps in the Care of Subjects with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Insights from the Thai Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2023Article
- Achilles Tendon Thickening as a Risk Factor of Cardiovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2023Article
- How Can We Identify Very High-Risk Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia?Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2022Review
- The Roles of Genetic Analysis in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimGenetic testing can provide a definitive diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). However, accessibility of genetic testing may be limited in certain countries where it is not considered "standard of care," including Japan. In addition, mutations responsible for FH cannot be identified in approximately 30% of patients.
methodsEXPLORE-J is a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The genetic data were analyzed and adjudicated as pathogenic, indeterminate, or nondetectable pathogenic variant.
resultsOf 1,944 patients, 431 underwent genetic screening. Overall, most patients had nonpathogenic variants of LDLR, LDLRAP1, or PCSK9 (n=396, 91.9%). Of the 25 (5.8%) patients with pathogenic variants, variants of the LDLR gene and the PCSK9 gene were seen in 10 and 15 patients, respectively. Indeterminate variants were observed in 10 (2.3%) patients. Of the 431 patients, eight (1.9%) met the criteria for a diagnosis of FH using the Japanese Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) 2017 guidelines. When genetic data were incorporated, 33 (7.7%) patients met the JAS guidelines. No patients with FH pathogenic variants satisfied the JAS clinical criteria for a diagnosis of FH.
conclusionsThe results revealed a higher prevalence of genetic mutations of FH among Japanese patients with ACS and a low sensitivity of the FH diagnostic criteria of the JAS 2017 guidelines. These findings highlight the difficulties of FH diagnosis in patients with ACS in the acute phase and suggest the importance of genetic testing and family history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.