Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529653›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Aedes albopictus bionomics data collection by citizen participation on Procida Island, a promising Mediterranean site for the assessment of innovative and community-based integrated pest management methods.

Beniamino Caputo, Giuliano Langella, Valeria Petrella, Chiara Virgillito, Mattia Manica, Federico Filipponi, Marianna Varone, Pasquale Primo, Arianna Puggioli, Romeo Bellini and 13 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Field Performance Assessment of IrradiatedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Beniamino CaputoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Giuliano LangellaDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Valeria PetrellaDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Chiara VirgillitoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6957-0226
Mattia ManicaDepartment of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Edmund Mach Foundation, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3709-1199
Federico FilipponiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-3734
Marianna VaroneDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Pasquale PrimoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8700-8042
Arianna PuggioliCentro Agricoltura Ambiente "Giorgio Nicoli", Crevalcore, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5376-5213
Romeo BelliniCentro Agricoltura Ambiente "Giorgio Nicoli", Crevalcore, Italy.
Costantino D'AntonioMinistry of Education, University and Research, Rome, Italy.
Luca IesuDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Liliana TulloDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Ciro RizzoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Annalisa LongobardiDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Germano SollazzoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-9627
Maryanna Martina PerrottaDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Miriana FabozziDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fabiana PalmieriDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8563-5181
Giuseppe SacconeDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9835-3693
Roberto RosàDepartment of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Edmund Mach Foundation, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8655-2230
Alessandra Della TorreDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Marco SalveminiDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2297-9267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decades, the colonization of Mediterranean Europe and of other temperate regions by Aedes albopictus created an unprecedented nuisance problem in highly infested areas and new public health threats due to the vector competence of the species. The Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) and the Incompatible Insect Technique (IIT) are insecticide-free mosquito-control methods, relying on mass release of irradiated/manipulated males, able to complement existing and only partially effective control tools. The validation of these approaches in the field requires appropriate experimental settings, possibly isolated to avoid mosquito immigration from other infested areas, and preliminary ecological and entomological data. We carried out a 4-year study in the island of Procida (Gulf of Naples, Italy) in strict collaboration with local administrators and citizens to estimate the temporal dynamics, spatial distribution, and population size of Ae. albopictus and the dispersal and survival of irradiated males. We applied ovitrap monitoring, geo-spatial analyses, mark-release-recapture technique, and a citizen-science approach. Results allow to predict the seasonal (from April to October, with peaks of 928-9,757 males/ha) and spatial distribution of the species, highlighting the capacity of Ae. albopictus population of Procida to colonize and maintain high frequencies in urban as well as in sylvatic inhabited environments. Irradiated males shown limited ability to disperse (mean daily distance travelled <60m) and daily survival estimates ranging between 0.80 and 0.95. Overall, the ecological characteristics of the island, the acquired knowledge on Ae. albopictus spatial and temporal distribution, the high human and Ae. albopictus densities and the positive attitude of the resident population in being active parts in innovative mosquito control projects provide the ground for evidence-based planning of the interventions and for the assessment of their effectiveness. In addition, the results highlight the value of creating synergies between research groups, local administrators, and citizens for affordable monitoring (and, in the future, control) of mosquito populations.

Indexed as

AedesAnimal DistributionAnimalsEcologyEnvironmentFemaleHumansIslandsItalyMaleMosquito ControlPopulation DensityResidence CharacteristicsSeasons

Identifiers

PMID34529653
PMCPMC8445450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.