Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34529946›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

How Tim proteins differentially exploit membrane features to attain robust target sensitivity.

Daniel Kerr, Zhiliang Gong, Tiffany Suwatthee, Adrienne Luoma, Sobhan Roy, Renee Scarpaci, Hyeondo Luke Hwang, J Michael Henderson, Kathleen D Cao, Wei Bu and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel KerrProgram in Biophysical Sciences, Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Chemistry, Chicago, Illinois; James Franck Institute, Chicago, Illinois.
Zhiliang GongDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago, Illinois; James Franck Institute, Chicago, Illinois.
Tiffany SuwattheeDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago, Illinois.
Adrienne LuomaCommittee on Immunology, Chicago, Illinois.
Sobhan RoyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Renee ScarpaciCity University of New York City College, New York, New York.
Hyeondo Luke HwangDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago, Illinois; James Franck Institute, Chicago, Illinois.
J Michael HendersonDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago, Illinois; James Franck Institute, Chicago, Illinois.
Kathleen D CaoDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago, Illinois; James Franck Institute, Chicago, Illinois.
Wei BuNSF's ChemMatCARS, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Binhua LinJames Franck Institute, Chicago, Illinois; NSF's ChemMatCARS, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Gregory T TietjenDepartment of Surgery, Section of Transplant and Immunology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Theodore L SteckDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Erin J AdamsProgram in Biophysical Sciences, Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, Chicago, Illinois; Committee on Immunology, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Ka Yee C LeeProgram in Biophysical Sciences, Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Chemistry, Chicago, Illinois; James Franck Institute, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: kayeelee@uchicago.edu.
Illinois Institute of Technology · USChicago Institute for Psychoanalysis · USUniversity of Chicago · USChicago Council on Global Affairs · USCity College of New York · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Synthetic Antigen Binder CoreU54GM087519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ZHOU, MING · 2010 to 2017
$31.9M
Molecular And Cellular Biology Training ProgramT32GM007183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GLICK, BENJAMIN S, RICE, PHOEBE A · 1985 to 2021
$23.9M
WHOLE CELL SIMULATIONP41GM104601 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI TAJKHORSHID, EMAD · 2012 to 2021
$19.0M
Nanoscale Approaches to Understanding Membrane Protein FunctionR35GM118145 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI STEPHEN G. SLIGAR · 2016 to 2026
$7.5M
Understanding the role of phospholipids in integrin signalingR01GM101048 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SLIGAR, STEPHEN G. · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM104601NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101048NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118145NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007183NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM087519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune surveillance cells such as T cells and phagocytes utilize integral plasma membrane receptors to recognize surface signatures on triggered and activated cells such as those in apoptosis. One such family of plasma membrane sensors, the transmembrane immunoglobulin and mucin domain (Tim) proteins, specifically recognize phosphatidylserine (PS) but elicit distinct immunological responses. The molecular basis for the recognition of lipid signals on target cell surfaces is not well understood. Previous results suggest that basic side chains present at the membrane interface on the Tim proteins might facilitate association with additional anionic lipids including but not necessarily limited to PS. We, therefore, performed a comparative quantitative analysis of the binding of the murine Tim1, Tim3, and Tim4, to synthetic anionic phospholipid membranes under physiologically relevant conditions. X-ray reflectivity and vesicle binding studies were used to compare the water-soluble domain of Tim3 with results previously obtained for Tim1 and Tim4. Although a calcium link was essential for all three proteins, the three homologs differed in how they balance the hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions driving membrane association. The proteins also varied in their sensing of phospholipid chain unsaturation and showed different degrees of cooperativity in their dependence on bilayer PS concentration. Surprisingly, trace amounts of anionic phosphatidic acid greatly strengthened the bilayer association of Tim3 and Tim4, but not Tim1. A novel mathematical model provided values for the binding parameters and illuminated the complex interplay among ligands. In conclusion, our results provide a quantitative description of the contrasting selectivity used by three Tim proteins in the recognition of phospholipids presented on target cell surfaces. This paradigm is generally applicable to the analysis of the binding of peripheral proteins to target membranes through the heterotropic cooperative interactions of multiple ligands.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsMucinsAnimalsHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1MembranesMicePhosphatidylserinesHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1Membrane ProteinsMucinsPhosphatidylserines

Identifiers

PMID34529946
PMCPMC8595564
OpenAlexW3201234083

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.