Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34532002›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2021

Safety assessment of HEA-enriched

Hsin-I Fu, Jui-Hsia Hsu, Tsung-Ju Li, Shu-Hsing Yeh, Chin-Chu Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of the Impact ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Immunopharmacological Insights intoCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025
    Review
  4. Preventative Effects ofNutrients · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Lowering the Intraocular Pressure in Rats and Rabbits byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Safety assessment of HEA-enrichedFood science & nutrition · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hsin-I FuBiotech Research Institute Grape King Bio Ltd Taoyuan City Taiwan.
Jui-Hsia HsuBiotech Research Institute Grape King Bio Ltd Taoyuan City Taiwan.
Tsung-Ju LiBiotech Research Institute Grape King Bio Ltd Taoyuan City Taiwan.
Shu-Hsing YehBiotech Research Institute Grape King Bio Ltd Taoyuan City Taiwan.
Chin-Chu ChenBiotech Research Institute Grape King Bio Ltd Taoyuan City Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-6552
Grape King (Taiwan) · TWShih Chien University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cordyceps cicadae myceliaLiquid fermentationN6‐(2‐hydroxyethyl) adenosinesafety assessment

Identifiers

PMID34532002
PMCPMC8441276
OpenAlexW3183309019

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.