Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535524›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Successful Trial of Practice Facilitation for Plan, Do, Study, Act Quality Improvement.

Kent F Sutton, Erica L Richman, Jennifer R Rees, Liza L Pugh-Nicholson, Macie M Craft, Shannon H Peaden, Monique Mackey, Jacqueline R Halladay, Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Writing Group

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kent F SuttonFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (KFS, ELR, JRH); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (KFS); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (JRR); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (LLP, MMC); Samford University, Birmingham, AL (LLP, SHP); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (MM); Area L Area Health Education Center, Rocky Mount, NC (JRH).
Erica L RichmanFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (KFS, ELR, JRH); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (KFS); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (JRR); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (LLP, MMC); Samford University, Birmingham, AL (LLP, SHP); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (MM); Area L Area Health Education Center, Rocky Mount, NC (JRH). elr@email.unc.edu.
Jennifer R ReesFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (KFS, ELR, JRH); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (KFS); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (JRR); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (LLP, MMC); Samford University, Birmingham, AL (LLP, SHP); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (MM); Area L Area Health Education Center, Rocky Mount, NC (JRH).
Liza L Pugh-NicholsonFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (KFS, ELR, JRH); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (KFS); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (JRR); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (LLP, MMC); Samford University, Birmingham, AL (LLP, SHP); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (MM); Area L Area Health Education Center, Rocky Mount, NC (JRH).
Macie M CraftFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (KFS, ELR, JRH); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (KFS); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (JRR); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (LLP, MMC); Samford University, Birmingham, AL (LLP, SHP); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (MM); Area L Area Health Education Center, Rocky Mount, NC (JRH).
Shannon H PeadenFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (KFS, ELR, JRH); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (KFS); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (JRR); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (LLP, MMC); Samford University, Birmingham, AL (LLP, SHP); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (MM); Area L Area Health Education Center, Rocky Mount, NC (JRH).
Monique MackeyFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (KFS, ELR, JRH); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (KFS); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (JRR); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (LLP, MMC); Samford University, Birmingham, AL (LLP, SHP); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (MM); Area L Area Health Education Center, Rocky Mount, NC (JRH).
Jacqueline R HalladayFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (KFS, ELR, JRH); Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (KFS); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (JRR); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (LLP, MMC); Samford University, Birmingham, AL (LLP, SHP); East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (MM); Area L Area Health Education Center, Rocky Mount, NC (JRH).
Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Writing Group

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure in the US Black Belt- Addressing the Triple ThreatUH3HL130691 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CHERRINGTON, ANDREA L, SAFFORD, MONIKA M · 2016 to 2020
$8.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NHLBI NIH HHS UH3 HL130691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPractice facilitation (PF) is a promising but relatively new intervention supporting data-driven practice change. There is a need to better detail research-based facilitation methods, which must balance intervention fidelity and time restrictions with the flexibility required for the intervention. As part of a multi-level 4-armed cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT), 32 rural primary care practices received PF for 1 year. We evaluated the feasibility of having facilitators guide practices to perform 4 key driver domain activities, implemented as Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, to better understand facilitation "exposure." We describe the intervention and activity length such that our experiences may be useful to other PF research efforts.

methodsThirty-two practices serving rural patients involved in the Southeastern Collaboration to Improvement Blood Pressure Control engaged with a facilitator to develop and implement PDSAs nested within key drivers of change domains. Numbers of months practices worked on activities deemed most likely to be sustained were captured along with practice satisfaction data.

resultsAll practices engaged in at least 4 domain-level activities, and 59% of the PDSAs were active for at least 3 months. There was variation by domain in the average length of the PDSA activities. Ninety-seven percent (31 of 32) of practices recommended similarly structured facilitation services to other primary care practices, and 84% (27 of 32) noted substantive changes in their care processes.

conclusionIn this trial, it was feasible for PFs to engage practices in at least 4 Key Driver quality improvement activities within 1 year, which will inform PF methods and protocol development in future trials.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQuality ImprovementHumansResearch DesignBlood PressurePDSA CyclesPrimary Health CareQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID34535524
PMCPMC8571730

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.