Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34539683›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021

Applications of Multi-Omics Technologies for Crop Improvement.

Yaodong Yang, Mumtaz Ali Saand, Liyun Huang, Walid Badawy Abdelaal, Jun Zhang, Yi Wu, Jing Li, Muzafar Hussain Sirohi, Fuyou Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
36.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 358 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Application of Omics Technologies for Cowpea Improvement.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Oil as a Hindrance to Oat (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yaodong YangHainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Oil Crops Biology/Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wenchang, China.
Mumtaz Ali SaandHainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Oil Crops Biology/Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wenchang, China.
Liyun HuangHainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Oil Crops Biology/Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wenchang, China.
Walid Badawy AbdelaalHainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Oil Crops Biology/Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wenchang, China.
Jun ZhangHainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Oil Crops Biology/Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wenchang, China.
Yi WuHainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Oil Crops Biology/Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wenchang, China.
Jing LiHainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Oil Crops Biology/Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wenchang, China.
Muzafar Hussain SirohiDepartment of Botany, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Pakistan.
Fuyou WangHainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Oil Crops Biology/Coconut Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wenchang, China.
Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences · CNCoconut Research Institute · CNShah Abdul Latif University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple "omics" approaches have emerged as successful technologies for plant systems over the last few decades. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have paved a way for a new generation of different omics, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics. However, metabolomics, ionomics, and phenomics have also been well-documented in crop science. Multi-omics approaches with high throughput techniques have played an important role in elucidating growth, senescence, yield, and the responses to biotic and abiotic stress in numerous crops. These omics approaches have been implemented in some important crops including wheat (

Indexed as

crop sciencesgenomicsionomicsmulti-omicspanomicsphenomicsproteomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID34539683
PMCPMC8446515
OpenAlexW3198031523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.