Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34540446›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

A Comprehensive Review of Intranasal Insulin and Its Effect on the Cognitive Function of Diabetics.

Mrunanjali Gaddam, Abhishek Singh, Nidhi Jain, Chaithanya Avanthika, Sharan Jhaveri, Ivonne De la Hoz, Sujana Sanka, Sri Rupa Goli

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Effect of insulin on indices of cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular compliance in young adults.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Intranasal Insulin for Treatment of Persistent Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction: A Scoping Review.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2024
    Article
  15. Delivery of Topical Drugs to the Olfactory Cleft.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Mrunanjali GaddamInternal Medicine, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, IND.
Abhishek SinghInternal Medicine, Himalayan Hospital, Dehradun, IND.
Nidhi JainInternal Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Chaithanya AvanthikaPediatrics, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, IND.
Sharan JhaveriInternal Medicine, Smt. Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Ivonne De la HozInternal Medicine, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, VEN.
Sujana SankaInternal Medicine, JC Medical Center, Orlando, USA.
Sri Rupa GoliInternal Medicine, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.
Andhra University · INHimalayan Institute of Yoga Science and Philosophy · USKarnataka Institute of Medical Sciences · INShri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute · INSir Ganga Ram Hospital · PKSmt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College · INUniversity of Zulia · VE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus continues to be a disease that affects a good percentage of our population. The majority affected need insulin on a day-to-day basis. Before the invention of the first manufactured insulin in 1978, dealing with diabetes took a significant toll on patient's lives. As technology and human innovation prevail, significant advancements have taken place in managing this chronic disease. Patients have an option to decide their mode of insulin delivery. Intranasal insulin, one such form, has a rapid mode of action while effectively controlling postprandial hyperglycemia. It has also been proven to reduce hypoglycemia and insulin resistance problems, which seem to be the main adverse effects of using conventional insulin regularly. However, due to the large dosages needed and high incurring costs, Intranasal Insulin is currently being used as adjunctive therapy along with conventional insulin.  We conducted a literature search in PubMed indexed journals using the medical terms "Intranasal insulin," "diabetes," and "cognitive impairment" to provide an overview of the mechanism of action of Intranasal Insulin, its distinctive cognitive benefits, and how it can be compared to the standard parenteral insulin therapy. One unique feature of intranasal insulin is its ability to directly affect the central nervous system, bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Not only does this help in reducing the peripheral side effects of insulin, but it has also proven to play a role in improving the cognitive function of diabetics, especially those who have Alzheimer's or mild cognitive impairment, as decreased levels of insulin in the brain has been shown to impact cognitive function negatively. However, it does come with its limitations of poor absorption through the nasal mucosa due to mucociliary clearance and proteolytic enzymes, our body's natural defence mechanisms. This review focuses on the efficacy of intranasal insulin, its potential benefits, limitations, and role in cognitive improvement in people with diabetes with pre-existing cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

alzheimer’s diseasecognitive functionsdiabetes mellitushyperglycemiaintranasal administrationintranasal insulinmild cognitive impairmentmitochondrial biogenesistype 1 diabetes mellitustype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID34540446
PMCPMC8442633
OpenAlexW3194102878

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.