Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34541293›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2021

Atorvastatin therapy in COVID-19 adult inpatients: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Lotfollah Davoodi, Hamed Jafarpour, Ziaeddin Oladi, Zakaria Zakariaei, Mohammad Tabarestani, Bahareh Moayed Ahmadi, Alireza Razavi, Amirhossein Hessami

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Statins: Beneficial Effects in Treatment of COVID-19.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lotfollah DavoodiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Communicable Diseases Research Institutes, Ghaem Shahr Razi Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Hamed JafarpourStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Ziaeddin OladiDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ghaem Shahr Razi Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Zakaria ZakariaeiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Orthopedic Research Center, Ghaem Shahr Razi Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mohammad TabarestaniStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Bahareh Moayed AhmadiVice-Chancellor for Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Alireza RazaviStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Amirhossein HessamiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRRazi Hospital · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEfficacious therapies are urgently required to tackle the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This trial aims to evaluate the effects of atorvastatin in comparison with standard care for adults hospitalized with COVID-19.

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial on adults hospitalized with COVID-19. Patients were randomized into a treatment group receiving atorvastatin + lopinavir/ritonavir or a control group receiving lopinavir/ritonavir alone. The primary outcome of the trial was the duration of hospitalization. The secondary outcomes were the need for interferon or immunoglobulin, receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation, and O2 saturation (O2sat), and level of C-reactive protein (CRP) which were assessed at the onset of admission and on the 6th day of treatment.

resultsForty patients were allocated and enrolled in the study with a 1 to 1 ratio in atorvastatin + lopinavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir groups. Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. CRP level was significantly decreased in the lopinavir/ritonavir + atorvastatin group (P < 0.0001, Cohen's d = 0.865) so that there was a significant difference in CRP level on the 6th day between the two groups (P = 0.01). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in O2sat on day 6. Although the duration of hospitalization in the lopinavir/ritonavir + atorvastatin group was significantly reduced compared to the control group (P = 0.012), there was no significant difference in the invasive mechanical ventilation reception and the need for interferon and immunoglobulin.

conclusionAtorvastatin + lopinavir/ritonavir may be more effective than lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19 adult hospitalized patients.

Indexed as

AtorvastatinCoronavirus disease 2019InpatientsLopinavirRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID34541293
PMCPMC8437805
OpenAlexW3199984496

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.