Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542187›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

Gene-gene interaction analysis incorporating network information via a structured Bayesian approach.

Xing Qin, Shuangge Ma, Mengyun Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xing QinSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-4999
Mengyun WuSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0970-4712

Funding

Yale SPORE in Skin CancerP50CA121974 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS W BOSENBERG, Harriet M. Kluger · 2006 to 2026
$43.9M
Yale SPORE in Lung Cancer (YSILC): The Biology and Personalized Treatment of Lung CancerP50CA196530 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Harriet M. Kluger · 2015 to 2026
$31.1M
Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121974NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196530NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence has shown that gene-gene interactions have important effects in biological processes of human diseases. Due to the high dimensionality of genetic measurements, interaction analysis usually suffers from a lack of sufficient information and has unsatisfactory results. Biological network information has been massively accumulated, allowing researchers to identify biomarkers while taking a system perspective, conducting network selection (of functionally related biomarkers), and accommodating network structures. In main-effect-only analysis, network information has been incorporated. However, effort has been limited in interaction analysis. Recently, link networks that describe the relationships between genetic interactions have been demonstrated as effective for revealing multiscale hierarchical organizations in networks and providing interesting findings beyond node networks. In this study, we develop a novel structured Bayesian interaction analysis approach to effectively incorporate network information. This study is among the first to identify gene-gene interactions with the assistance of network selection, while simultaneously accommodating the underlying network structures of both main effects and interactions. It innovatively respects multiple hierarchies among main effects, interactions, and networks. The Bayesian technique is adopted, which may be more informative for estimation and prediction over some other techniques. An efficient variational Bayesian expectation-maximization algorithm is developed to explore the posterior distribution. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate the practical superiority of the proposed approach. The analysis of TCGA data on melanoma and lung cancer leads to biologically sensible findings with satisfactory prediction accuracy and selection stability.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksMelanomaAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansassistance of network selectiongene-gene interactionlink networkstructured analysis

Identifiers

PMID34542187
PMCPMC8595614

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.