ArticleStatistics in medicine2021
Gene-gene interaction analysis incorporating network information via a structured Bayesian approach.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- BHCox: Bayesian heredity-constrained Cox proportional hazards models for detecting gene-environment interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Bayesian Approaches in Exploring Gene-environment and Gene-gene Interactions: A Comprehensive Review.Cancer genomics & proteomics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing evidence has shown that gene-gene interactions have important effects in biological processes of human diseases. Due to the high dimensionality of genetic measurements, interaction analysis usually suffers from a lack of sufficient information and has unsatisfactory results. Biological network information has been massively accumulated, allowing researchers to identify biomarkers while taking a system perspective, conducting network selection (of functionally related biomarkers), and accommodating network structures. In main-effect-only analysis, network information has been incorporated. However, effort has been limited in interaction analysis. Recently, link networks that describe the relationships between genetic interactions have been demonstrated as effective for revealing multiscale hierarchical organizations in networks and providing interesting findings beyond node networks. In this study, we develop a novel structured Bayesian interaction analysis approach to effectively incorporate network information. This study is among the first to identify gene-gene interactions with the assistance of network selection, while simultaneously accommodating the underlying network structures of both main effects and interactions. It innovatively respects multiple hierarchies among main effects, interactions, and networks. The Bayesian technique is adopted, which may be more informative for estimation and prediction over some other techniques. An efficient variational Bayesian expectation-maximization algorithm is developed to explore the posterior distribution. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate the practical superiority of the proposed approach. The analysis of TCGA data on melanoma and lung cancer leads to biologically sensible findings with satisfactory prediction accuracy and selection stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.