Evidence mapPaperPMID 34544205Full record

Trial reportESC heart failure2021

Effects of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin on vascular function in patients with chronic heart failure.

Julie Kolwelter, Agnes Bosch, Susanne Jung, Lena Stabel, Dennis Kannenkeril, Christian Ott, Peter Bramlage, Mario Schiffer, Stephan Achenbach, Roland E Schmieder

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Safety and Short-Term Effects of Empagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and End-Stage Renal Disease.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie KolwelterDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Agnes BoschDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Susanne JungDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Lena StabelDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Dennis KannenkerilDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Christian OttDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Peter BramlageInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4970-2110
Mario SchifferDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Stephan AchenbachDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Roland E SchmiederDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEIPPMed (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsImpairment of vascular function contributes to the progression of chronic heart failure (HF) by increasing the afterload. Treatment with selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improves the prognosis of HF, but the precise mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of empagliflozin on vascular function in patients with HF. METHODS AND

resultsIn an investigator initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, clinical study, patients with HF NYHA II-III and an ejection fraction of 49% or less were randomized 2:1 to receive empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo for 3 months. A total of 74 patients (15% female), aged 66 ± 9 years, with a mean ejection fraction of 39 ± 8% and a median NTproBNP of 558 pg/mL (IQR 219-1051 pg/mL), were included. Vascular parameters such as central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), central pulse pressure (cPP), forward (FPH), and reflected pressure pulse height (RPH) decreased under resting conditions after 1 and 3 months (1 month: cSBP -6.4 ± 8.3 mmHg, P < 0.001, cPP -3.0 ± 6.6 mmHg, P = 0.004, FPH -2.5 ± 4.5 mmHg, P = 0.001, RPH -1.6 ± 3.0 mmHg, P = 0.001; 3 months: cSBP -4.6 ± 8.4 mmHg, P = 0.001, cPP -3.1 ± 4.8 mmHg, P < 0.001, FPH -1.7 ± 3.7 mmHg, P = 0.004, RPH -1.4 ± 2.5 mmHg, P = 0.001) in patients treated with empagliflozin (n = 45). In accordance, cSBP and cPP decreased in patients with empagliflozin treatment under 24 h ambulatory conditions after 1 and 3 months (1 month: cSBP -4.8 ± 10.1 mmHg, P = 0.003, cPP -2.0 ± 5.7 mmHg, P = 0.026; 3 months: cSBP -4.7 ± 9.0 mmHg, P = 0.002, cPP -2.1 ± 6.4 mmHg, P = 0.044). In the placebo group, there was no significant change after 1 and 3 months. The decrease in cSBP under resting conditions (-5.7 ± 2.4 mmHg, P = 0.019) after 1 month and in cSBP (-6.0 ± 2.6, P = 0.027) as well as in pulse wave velocity (-0.5 ± 0.2 m/s, P = 0.021) under 24 h ambulatory conditions after 3 months was greater in the empagliflozin group than in the placebo group.

conclusionsWe found an improvement of vascular function after treatment with empagliflozin that indicates decreased afterload of the left ventricle and may contribute to the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibition in HF.

Indexed as

Heart FailureSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAgedBenzhydryl CompoundsFemaleGlucoseGlucosidesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulse Wave AnalysisSodiumBenzhydryl CompoundsempagliflozinGlucoseGlucosidesSodiumSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsBlood pressureCentral haemodynamicsChronic heart failureEmpagliflozinSGLT2 inhibitorVascular function

Identifiers

PMID34544205
PMCPMC8712907
OpenAlexW3200267627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.