Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34548654›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2021

The case for low-level BACE1 inhibition for the prevention of Alzheimer disease.

Eric McDade, Iryna Voytyuk, Paul Aisen, Randall J Bateman, Maria C Carrillo, Bart De Strooper, Christian Haass, Eric M Reiman, Reisa Sperling, Pierre N Tariot and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Discovery of an APP-selective BACE1 inhibitor for Alzheimer's disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Eric McDadeDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. ericmcdade@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-3866
Iryna VoytyukDepartment of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Paul AisenAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Randall J BatemanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7729-1702
Maria C CarrilloAlzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-2387
Bart De StrooperDepartment of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Christian HaassGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany.
Eric M ReimanBanner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0705-3696
Reisa SperlingCenter for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Pierre N TariotBanner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6058-8032
Riqiang YanDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Colin L MastersThe Florey Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Robert VassarDavee Department of Neurology, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. r-vassar@northwestern.edu.
Stefan F LichtenthalerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany. stefan.lichtenthaler@dzne.de.
Banner Alzheimer’s InstituteGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BEWashington University in St. Louis · USAlzheimer's Association · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

DIAN-TU Primary Prevention Trial NfL Characterization Admin SuppU01AG059798 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MCDADE, ERIC MARTIN · 2018 to 2025
$97.9M
DIAN-TU Next Generation Prevention Trial - Data Request Management SupplementR01AG053267 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2017 to 2023
$34.9M
Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network Trials Unit - Adaptive Prevention TrialR01AG046179 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2014 to 2019
$26.6M
DOMINANTLY INHERITED ALZHEIMER NETWORK TRIAL: AN OPPORTUNITY TO PREVENT DEMENTIAU01AG042791 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2013 to 2018
$8.9M
DIAN-TU: Next Generation Prevention TrialR56AG053267 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2016 to 2016
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01AG053267-S1NIA NIH HHS R01AG053267-S2NIA NIH HHS R56 AG053267NIA NIH HHS U01 AG059798NIA NIH HHS U01AG42791-S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in older individuals (>65 years) and has a long presymptomatic phase. Preventive therapies for AD are not yet available, and potential disease-modifying therapies targeting amyloid-β plaques in symptomatic stages of AD have only just been approved in the United States. Small-molecule inhibitors of β-site amyloid precursor protein (APP)-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1; also known as β-secretase 1) reduce the production of amyloid-β peptide and are among the most advanced drug candidates for AD. However, to date all phase II and phase III clinical trials of BACE inhibitors were either concluded without benefit or discontinued owing to futility or the occurrence of adverse effects. Adverse effects included early, mild cognitive impairment that was associated with all but one inhibitor; preliminary results suggest that the cognitive effects are non-progressive and reversible. These discontinuations have raised questions regarding the suitability of BACE1 as a drug target for AD. In this Perspective, we discuss the status of BACE inhibitors and suggest ways in which the results of the discontinued trials can inform the development of future clinical trials of BACE inhibitors and related secretase modulators as preventative therapies. We also propose a series of experiments that should be performed to inform 'go-no-go' decisions in future trials with BACE inhibitors and consider the possibility that low levels of BACE1 inhibition could avoid adverse effects while achieving efficacy for AD prevention.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlaque, AmyloidResearch DesignAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAPP protein, humanAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesBACE1 protein, humanEnzyme Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34548654
OpenAlexW3199353075

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.