Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34557646›Full record

ReviewAnimal models and experimental medicine2021

An insight on established retinal injury mechanisms and prevalent retinal stem cell activation pathways in vertebrate models.

Rinchen Doma Sherpa, Subhra Prakash Hui

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Retina regeneration: lessons from vertebrates.Oxford open neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rinchen Doma SherpaS. N. Pradhan Centre for Neurosciences University of Calcutta Kolkata India.ORCID 0000-0002-9223-0289
Subhra Prakash HuiS. N. Pradhan Centre for Neurosciences University of Calcutta Kolkata India.ORCID 0000-0001-5018-4918
University of Calcutta · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementing different tools and injury mechanisms in multiple animal models of retina regeneration, researchers have discovered the existence of retinal stem/progenitor cells. Although they appear to be distributed uniformly across the vertebrate lineage, the reparative potential of the retina is mainly restricted to lower vertebrates. Regenerative repair post-injury requires the creation of a proliferative niche, vital for proper stem cell activation, propagation, and lineage differentiation. This seems to be lacking in mammals. Hence, in this review, we first discuss the many forms of retinal injuries that have been generated using animal models. Next, we discuss how they are utilized to stimulate regeneration and mimic eye disease pathologies. The key to driving stem cell activation in mammals relies on the information we can gather from these models. Lastly, we present a brief update about the genes, growth factors, and signaling pathways that have been brought to light using these models.

Indexed as

RetinaRetinal DiseasesAnimalsCell ProliferationStem CellsVertebratesanimal modelsretina injuryretinal stem cellsretina regenerationzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34557646
PMCPMC8446703
OpenAlexW3180258659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.