Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34558017›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2022

Prediction of body fat in adolescents: validity of the methods relative fat mass, body adiposity index and body fat index.

Irismar G A Encarnação, Matheus S Cerqueira, Diego A S Silva, João C B Marins, Pedro M Magalhães

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validity of non-traditional measures of obesity compared to total body fat across the life course: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Irismar G A EncarnaçãoSchool of Education, Campus Santa Apolónia, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal. irismarcapoeiraefi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-8353
Matheus S CerqueiraCampus Rio Pomba, Federal Institute Southeast of Minas Gerais, Rio Pomba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6723-6083
Diego A S SilvaPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-7906
João C B MarinsDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0727-3450
Pedro M MagalhãesSchool of Education, Campus Santa Apolónia, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2492-1499
Polytechnic Institute of Bragança · PTInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo verify the validity of anthropometric methods body adiposity index (BAI), relative fat mass (RFM) and body fat index (BFI) to estimate body fat percentage (%BF) in adolescents.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out with 420 Brazilian adolescents aged 15-19 years, stratified by age (< 18 years, n = 356; ≥ 18 years, n = 64) and sex (boys, n = 216; girls, n = 204). The Anthropometric measurements height, body weight, hip circumference and waist circumference were collected to calculate the %BF by BAI, RFM, BFI methods. Subsequently, %BF was measured by dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), adopted as a reference method. In the statistical analysis of the data, the Pearson correlation test and the paired t test between %BF obtained by the equations and by the DXA were performed. The method validation criterion was that 68% of individuals should be within an acceptable error range of ± 3.5% of BF and Cohen's Kappa index ≥ 0.61. Additionally, the Bland-Altman graphical analysis was performed.

resultsAll methods showed a high correlation with DXA. For the Kappa index, only the RFM reached the criterion in the total sample (0.67) and in the sample < 18 years (0.68). None of the methods reached the criterion of 68% of the sample within the error range of ± 3.5% of BF.

conclusionThe BAI, RFM and BFI equations were not valid for predicting BF in the studied sample according to the criteria adopted regardless of sex or age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdiposityAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentAnthropometryBody CompositionBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObesityAnthropometryBody compositionBody fatDXATeenagers

Identifiers

PMID34558017
OpenAlexW3201643546

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.