Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561511›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Controlling for human population stratification in rare variant association studies.

Matthieu Bouaziz, Jimmy Mullaert, Benedetta Bigio, Yoann Seeleuthner, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Alexandre Alcais, Laurent Abel, Aurélie Cobat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Gene-based association analysis of a large patient cohort provides insights into genetics of atypical femur fractures.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthieu BouazizLaboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM U1163, Paris, France.
Jimmy MullaertLaboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM U1163, Paris, France.
Benedetta BigioSt. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Rockefeller Branch, The Rockefeller University, New York, USA.
Yoann SeeleuthnerLaboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM U1163, Paris, France.
Jean-Laurent CasanovaLaboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM U1163, Paris, France.
Alexandre AlcaisLaboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM U1163, Paris, France.
Laurent Abel *Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM U1163, Paris, France.
Aurélie Cobat *Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM U1163, Paris, France. aurelie.cobat@inserm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population stratification is a confounder of genetic association studies. In analyses of rare variants, corrections based on principal components (PCs) and linear mixed models (LMMs) yield conflicting conclusions. Studies evaluating these approaches generally focused on limited types of structure and large sample sizes. We investigated the properties of several correction methods through a large simulation study using real exome data, and several within- and between-continent stratification scenarios. We considered different sample sizes, with situations including as few as 50 cases, to account for the analysis of rare disorders. Large samples showed that accounting for stratification was more difficult with a continental than with a worldwide structure. When considering a sample of 50 cases, an inflation of type-I-errors was observed with PCs for small numbers of controls (≤ 100), and with LMMs for large numbers of controls (≥ 1000). We also tested a novel local permutation method (LocPerm), which maintained a correct type-I-error in all situations. Powers were equivalent for all approaches pointing out that the key issue is to properly control type-I-errors. Finally, we found that power of analyses including small numbers of cases can be increased, by adding a large panel of external controls, provided an appropriate stratification correction was used.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationComputer SimulationExomeGenetic Association StudiesGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLinear ModelsPrincipal Component AnalysisRare DiseasesSample Size

Identifiers

PMID34561511
PMCPMC8463695

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.