Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34564833›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2021

Is There a Gender Difference in the Response to onabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine? Insights from a Real-Life European Multicenter Study on 2879 Patients.

Raffaele Ornello, Fayyaz Ahmed, Andrea Negro, Anna Maria Miscio, Antonio Santoro, Alicia Alpuente, Antonio Russo, Marcello Silvestro, Sabina Cevoli, Nicoletta Brunelli and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex and gender-related differences in neurological diseases: current challenges and recommendations for clinical practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Excellent Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA: Different Definitions, Different Predictors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 16 institutions in 5 countries.

Raffaele OrnelloNeuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-4031
Fayyaz AhmedDepartment of Neurosciences, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2746-0889
Andrea NegroDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189, Rome, RM, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3590-298X
Anna Maria MiscioUnit of Neurology, Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Antonio SantoroUnit of Neurology, Headache Center, Fondazione IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Alicia AlpuenteHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-9401
Antonio RussoDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Marcello SilvestroDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic, and Aging Sciences, Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Sabina CevoliIRCCS Istituto delle scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4668-4295
Nicoletta BrunelliHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8590-9015
Fabrizio VernieriHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-9336
Licia GrazziNeuroology Department, Headache Center, IRCCS Foundation "Carlo Besta" Neurological Institute, via Celoria,11, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6535-1109
Carlo BaraldiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-1888
Simona GuerzoniDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical Toxicology-Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-2782
Anna P AndreouHeadache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-6626
Giorgio LambruHeadache Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2780-4776
Katharina KammDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany.
Ruth RuscheweyhDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9510-7158
Marco RussoNeurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Headache Center, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-8555
Paola TorelliHeadache Center, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-2353
Elena FilatovaDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Nina LatyshevaDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Postgraduate Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-5540
Anna Gryglas-DworakHeadache Center Wroclaw, Wrocław, Poland.
Marcin StraburzyńskiHeadache Clinic, Terapia Neurologiczna Samodzielni, Maurycego Mochnackiego 10, 02-042, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9811-3526
Calogera ButeraNeurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Bruno ColomboNeurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FilippiNeurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5485-0479
Patricia Pozo-RosichHeadache Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-4702
Paolo MartellettiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189, Rome, RM, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6556-4128
Simona SaccoNeuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio 1 Coppito, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy. simona.sacco@univaq.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0651-1939
Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESechenov University · RUUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMigraine is mostly a female disorder because of its lower prevalence in men. Less than 20% of patients included in the available studies on migraine treatments are men; hence, the evidence on migraine treatments might not apply to men. The aims of the present study were to provide reliable information on the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) for chronic migraine in men and to compare clinical benefits between men and women.

methodsWe performed a pooled patient-level gender-specific analysis of real-life data on BT-A for chronic migraine of patients followed-up to 9 months. We reported the 50% responder rates during each BT-A cycle, defined as percentage of reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs) compared to baseline, along with 75% and 30% responder rates. We also reported the mean decrease in MHDs and in days of acute medication use (DAMs) during each BT-A cycle as compared to baseline. We also evaluated the reasons for stopping the treatment within the third cycle.

resultsWe included an overall cohort of 2879 patients, 522 of whom (18.1%) were men. In men, 50% responder rates were 27.7% during the first BT-A cycle, 29.2% during the second, and 35.6% during the third cycle; in women, the corresponding rates were 26.6%, 33.5%, and 41.0%. In the overall cohort, responder rates did not differ between men and women during the first two cycles; during the third cycle, the distribution was different (P < 0.001) mostly because of higher rates of treatment stopping and non-responders in men. In the propensity score matched cohort, the trend was maintained but lost its statistical significance. Both men and women had a significant decrease in MHDs and in DAMs with BT-A treatment (P < 0.001). There were no gender differences in those changes with the only exception of MHD decrease which, during the third cycle, was lower in men than in women (7.4 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.016 in the overall cohort and 9.1 vs 12.5 days, P = 0.009 in the propensity score matched cohort). At the end of follow-up, 152 men and 485 women stopped BT-A treatment (29.1% vs 20.6%; P < 0.001). The relative proportion of patients stopping treatment because of inadequate response (less than 30% decrease in MHDs from baseline) was higher in men than in women (42.8% vs 39.6%), while the proportion of patients stopping because of adverse events was higher in women than in men (5.6% vs 0%; P = 0.031).

conclusionsOur pooled analysis suggests that the response to BT-A is significant in both men and women with a small gender difference in favor of women. Men tended to stop the treatment more frequently than women. We emphasize the need for more gender-specific data on migraine treatments from randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

Indexed as

Chronic migraineGender differenceMenMigraineOnabotulinumtoxinA

Identifiers

PMID34564833
PMCPMC8586325
OpenAlexW3202761006

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.