Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34567021›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Species Delimitation of Asteropyrum (Ranunculaceae) Based on Morphological, Molecular, and Ecological Variation.

Shanmei Cheng, Weidong Zeng, Jing Wang, Lei Liu, Hua Liang, Yixuan Kou, Hengchang Wang, Dengmei Fan, Zhiyong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PhytoKeys · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A new synonym ofPhytoKeys · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shanmei ChengLaboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Weidong ZengLaboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Jing WangLaboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Lei LiuLaboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Hua LiangLaboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Yixuan KouLaboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Hengchang WangCAS Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Dengmei FanLaboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Zhiyong ZhangLaboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Jiangxi Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectively evaluating different lines of evidence within a formalized framework is the most efficient and theoretically grounded approach for defining robust species hypotheses. Asteropyrum Drumm. et Hutch. is a small genus of perennial herb containing two species, A. cavaleriei and A. peltatum. The distinction of these two species mainly lies in the shape and size of leaf blades. However, these characters have been considered labile and could not differentiate the two species reliably. In this study, we investigated the variation of the leaf blades of 28 populations across the whole range of Asteropyrum using the landmark-based geometric morphometrics (GMM), sought genetic gaps within this genus using DNA barcoding, phylogenetic reconstruction and population genetic methods, and compared the predicted ecological niches of the two species. The results showed that the leaf form (shape and size) was overlapped between the two species; barcode gap was not detected within the genus Asteropyrum; and little ecological and geographical differentiation was found between the two taxa. Two genetic clusters detected by population genetic analysis did not match the two morphospecies. The results suggest that there are no distinct boundaries between the two species of Asteropyrum in terms of morphology, genetics and ecology and this present classification should be abandoned. We anticipate that range-wide population genomic studies would properly delineate the species boundaries and help to understand the evolution and speciation within Asteropyrum.

Indexed as

Asteropyrum Drumm. et Hutch.Automatic Barcode Gap Discoverygeometric morphometricsintegrative taxonomyleaf shapeleaf sizeniche modelingspecies delimitation

Identifiers

PMID34567021
PMCPMC8461316
OpenAlexW3199900657

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.