ReviewUltrasound (Leeds, England)2021
Value of Doppler ultrasound in early detection of diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease can be delayed by limitations of primary biomarkers, which are microalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate. A number of Doppler ultrasound studies have associated an increase in intrarenal vascular resistance with the disease, which makes ultrasound a potential adjunct tool for early diagnosis. However, there is inadequate evidence to establish the effectiveness of including Doppler ultrasound in the diagnostic process. This systematic review was therefore conducted to determine the value of using Doppler ultrasound in early detection of diabetic kidney disease. Electronic literature searches were carried out in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE. All published prospective studies with records of intrarenal Doppler ultrasound, microalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate were obtained, and their relationship as parameters for diabetic kidney disease assessed. The meta-analysis of Doppler ultrasound versus albuminuria shows insignificant statistical difference between high resistive index of ≥ 0.7 and albuminuria, with the resistive index being the favoured parameter on the forest plot, making Doppler ultrasound highly comparable with albuminuria for the detection of diabetic kidney disease. Again, there was a significant statistical difference between high intrarenal resistive index of ≥ 0.7 and low estimated glomerular filtration rate of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.