Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34568910›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021

A two-stage testing strategy for detecting genes×environment interactions in association studies.

Jiabin Zhou, Shitao Li, Ying Zhou, Xiaona Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiabin ZhouDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China.
Shitao LiDepartment of Basic Course, Shenyang University of Technology, Liaoyang 111000, China.
Ying ZhouDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0037-0998
Xiaona ShengSchool of Information Engineering, Harbin University, Harbin 150086, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying gene×environment (G×E) interactions, especially when rare variants are included in genome-wide association studies, is a major challenge in statistical genetics. However, the detection of G×E interactions is very important for understanding the etiology of complex diseases. Although currently some statistical methods have been developed to detect the interactions between genes and environment, the detection of the interactions for the case of rare variants is still limited. Therefore, it is particularly important to develop a new method to detect the interactions between genes and environment for rare variants. In this study, we extend an existing method of adaptive combination of P-values (ADA) and design a novel strategy (called iSADA) for testing the effects of G×E interactions for rare variants. We propose a new two-stage test to detect the interactions between genes and environment in a certain region of a chromosome or even for the whole genome. First, the score statistic is used to test the associations between trait value and the interaction terms of genes and environment and obtain the original P-values. Then, based on the idea of the ADA method, we further construct a full test statistic via the P-values of the preliminary tests in the first stage, so that we can comprehensively test the interactions between genes and environment in the considered genome region. Simulation studies are conducted to compare our proposed method with other existing methods. The results show that the iSADA has higher power than other methods in each case. A GAW17 data set is also applied to illustrate the applicability of the new method.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenome-Wide Association StudyComputer SimulationGenetic VariationModels, Geneticgenes×environment interactionsP-valuerare variantscore testtwo-stage approach

Identifiers

PMID34568910
PMCPMC8496220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.