ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021
The Evolution of the Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroimaging in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis: Key Concepts to Unlock Innovation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Classification of Craniofacial Deformities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The cranial capacity of the Saudi population measured using 3D computed tomography scans.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2023Article
- A Radiation-Free Classification Pipeline for Craniosynostosis Using Statistical Shape Modeling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Poor education and urgent information need for emergency physicians about rare diseases in China.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Active Cervical Range of Motion in Babies with Positional Plagiocephaly: Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Craniosynostosis, the premature closure of cranial sutures, is one of the principal causes of pediatric skull deformities. It can cause aesthetic, neurological, acoustic, ophthalmological complications up to real emergencies. Craniosynostosis are primarily diagnosed with accurate physical examination, skull measurement and observation of the deformity, but the radiological support currently plays an increasingly important role in confirming a more precise diagnosis and better planning for therapeutic interventions. The clinician must know how to diagnose in the earliest and least invasive way for the child. In the past, technological limitations reduced the choices; today, however, there are plenty of choices and it is necessary to use the various types of available imaging correctly. In the future, imaging techniques will probably rewrite the common classifications we use today. We provide an updated review of the role of imaging in this condition, through the ages, to outline the correct choice for the clinician for an early and non-invasive diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.