Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34575231›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Comprehensive Comparison of the Effect of Inotropes on Cardiorenal Syndrome in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Wei-Cheng Chen, Meng-Hsuan Lin, Chieh-Lung Chen, Yi-Ching Lai, Chih-Yu Chen, Yu-Chao Lin, Chin-Chuan Hung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. New Insight in Cardiorenal Syndrome: From Biomarkers to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Consensus document on palliative care in cardiorenal patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Cheng ChenGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 404333, Taiwan.
Meng-Hsuan LinDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, China Medical University, 100 Jingmao Road, Bei-tun Dist., Taichung 406040, Taiwan.
Chieh-Lung ChenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yude Road, North Dist., Taichung 404332, Taiwan.
Yi-Ching LaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yude Road, North Dist., Taichung 404332, Taiwan.
Chih-Yu ChenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yude Road, North Dist., Taichung 404332, Taiwan.
Yu-Chao LinDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yude Road, North Dist., Taichung 404332, Taiwan.
Chin-Chuan HungDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, China Medical University, 100 Jingmao Road, Bei-tun Dist., Taichung 406040, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1395-4834
China Medical University · TWAsia University · TW

Funding

China Medical University Hospital DMR-108-023China Medical University, Taiwan CMU109-S-12Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 110-2320-B-039 -020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevention of cardiorenal syndrome through treatment with inotropic agents remains challenging. This network meta-analysis evaluated the safety and renoprotective effects of inotropes on patients with advanced heart failure (HF) using a frequentist random-effects model. A systematic database search was performed until 31 January 2021, and a total of 37 trials were included. Inconsistency, publication bias, and subgroup analyses were conducted. The levosimendan group exhibited significantly decreased mortality compared with the control (odds ratio (OR): 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.84), milrinone (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.30-0.84), and dobutamine (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57-0.97) groups. In terms of renal protection, levosimendan (standardized mean difference (SMD): 1.67; 95% CI: 1.17-2.18) and dobutamine (SMD: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.87-2.12) more favorably improved the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than the control treatment did, but they did not significantly reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury. Furthermore, levosimendan had the highest P-score, indicating that it most effectively reduced mortality and improved renal function (e.g., GFR and serum creatinine level), even in patients with renal insufficiency. In conclusion, levosimendan is a safe alternative for protecting renal function on cardiorenal syndrome in patients with advanced HF.

Indexed as

cardiorenal syndromeheart failurelevosimendanmortalitynetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34575231
PMCPMC8471363
OpenAlexW3199720774

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.