ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021
DNA Dyes-Highly Sensitive Reporters of Cell Quantification: Comparison with Other Cell Quantification Methods.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular engineering of Cyanine-Hoechst hybrid materials for nanoscale DNA and chromatin imaging.JPhys materials · 2026Article
- Anti-invasive and cytotoxic evaluation of a (+)-pinoresinol-based semisynthetic library against glioblastoma.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating DAPI stain to assess sperm membrane integrity by flow cytometry in livestock species.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Non-invasive tools for analysis of plasma membrane protein topology in living cells.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Synergistic anticancer efficacy of optimized curcumin-piperine loaded magnetic nanoparticles for the treatment of colorectal cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Article
- Cromolyn sodium and masitinib combination inhibits fibroblast-myofibroblast transition and exerts additive cell-protective and antioxidant effects on a bleomycin-induced in vitro fibrosis model.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2024Article
- Ir(III) Half-Sandwich Photosensitizers with a π-Expansive Ligand for Efficient Anticancer Photodynamic Therapy.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Review
- Resveratrol Analogues as Selective Estrogen Signaling Pathway Modulators: Structure-Activity Relationship.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Octacalcium Phosphate for Bone Tissue Engineering: Synthesis, Modification, and In Vitro Biocompatibility Assessment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- A BODIPY-Hoechst conjugate for nuclear DNA staining.Journal of porphyrins and phthalocyaninesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell quantification is widely used both in basic and applied research. A typical example of its use is drug discovery research. Presently, plenty of methods for cell quantification are available. In this review, the basic techniques used for cell quantification, with a special emphasis on techniques based on fluorescent DNA dyes, are described. The main aim of this review is to guide readers through the possibilities of cell quantification with various methods and to show the strengths and weaknesses of these methods, especially with respect to their sensitivity, accuracy, and length. As these methods are frequently accompanied by an analysis of cell proliferation and cell viability, some of these approaches are also described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.