Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34578239›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm In Vitro Activity of Liquid and Vapour Phases of Selected Essential Oils against

Malwina Brożyna, Justyna Paleczny, Weronika Kozłowska, Grzegorz Chodaczek, Ruth Dudek-Wicher, Anna Felińczak, Joanna Gołębiewska, Agata Górniak, Adam Junka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Essential oils and their blends: mechanism of antibacterial activity and antibiofilm potential on food-grade maize starch packaging films.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chemical and Biological Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Malwina BrożynaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9520-3377
Justyna PalecznyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8783-7123
Weronika KozłowskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8330-4576
Grzegorz ChodaczekBioimaging Laboratory, Łukasiewicz Research Network-PORT Polish Center for Technology Development, 54-066 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1407-6693
Ruth Dudek-WicherDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8033-3531
Anna FelińczakDepartment of Organisation and Management, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0607-4495
Joanna GołębiewskaFaculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, 02-662 Warsaw, Poland.
Agata GórniakLaboratory of Elemental Analysis and Structural Research, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9580-6941
Adam JunkaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-8903

Funding

Medical University of Wroclaw STMD.230.20.126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high resistance of staphylococcal biofilm against antibiotics and developing resistance against antiseptics induces a search for novel antimicrobial compounds. Due to acknowledged and/or alleged antimicrobial activity of EOs, their application seems to be a promising direction to follow. Nevertheless, the high complexity of EOs composition and differences in laboratory protocols of the antimicrobial activity assessment hinders the exact estimation of EOs effectiveness. To overcome these disadvantages, in the present work we analysed the effectiveness of volatile and liquid forms of seven EOs (derived from thyme, tea tree, basil, rosemary, eucalyptus, lavender, and menthol mint) against 16 staphylococcal biofilm-forming strains using cohesive set of in vitro techniques, including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, inverted Petri dish, modified disk-diffusion assay, microdilution techniques, antibiofilm dressing activity measurement, AntiBioVol protocol, fluorescence/confocal microscopy, and dynamic light scattering. Depending on the requirements of the technique, EOs were applied in emulsified or non-emulsified form. The obtained results revealed that application of different in vitro techniques allows us to get a comprehensive set of data and to gain insight into the analysed phenomena. In the course of our investigation, liquid and volatile fractions of thyme EO displayed the highest antibiofilm activity. Liquid fractions of rosemary oil were the second most active against

Indexed as

biofilmessential oilsS. aureus

Identifiers

PMID34578239
PMCPMC8466273

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.