Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579266›Full record

ReviewVaccines2021

A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research.

Ala E Tabor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From Benign Parasite to Emerging Pathogen: A Review ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Evolution of tick vaccinology.Parasitology · 2024
    Review
  6. Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Universal Tick Vaccines: Candidates and Remaining Challenges.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ala E TaborQueensland Alliance for Agriculture & Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, The University of Queensland, 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7147-1078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick vaccine research in Australia has demonstrated leadership worldwide through the development of the first anti-tick vaccine in the 1990s. Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation's (CSIRO) research led to the development of vaccines and/or precursors of vaccines (such as crude extracts) for both the cattle tick and the paralysis tick. CSIRO commercialised the Bm86 vaccine in the early 1990s for

Indexed as

AustraliaIxodesRhipicephalustick vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34579266
PMCPMC8473225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.