Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579767›Full record

Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2021

Management of toxic optic neuropathy via a combination of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells with electromagnetic stimulation.

Emin Özmert, Umut Arslan

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04877067 phase3completednot on this map

Bioretina Inc Ankara University Technopolis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara Universitesi TeknokentRan2019 to 2021Enrolled18ConditionsMethanol Poisoning, Toxic Optic Neuropathy, Stem Cell Tyrosine Kinase 1 Y842X, Magnetic Field ExposureArmsWharton jelly derived mesenchymal stem cell, Repetitive electromagnetic stimulation
NCT05800301 phase3completednot on this map

Bioretina, Ankara University Technopolis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara Universitesi TeknokentRan2019 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsRetinitis PigmentosaArmsWharton's jelly derived mesenchymal stemcells, Magnovision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tissue Engineering and Ophthalmology.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emin ÖzmertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Umut ArslanAnkara University Technopolis, Bioretina Eye Clinic, Neorama Ofis 55-56 Yaşam Cad. No 13/A, Beştepe /Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey. drumutarslan@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4146-8083
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the effect of the combination of Wharton's jelly derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSC) and high frequency repetitive electromagnetic stimulation (rEMS) in the therapy of toxic optic neuropathies with severe symptoms after the available current therapy modalities which were unsucessful. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis prospective, open-label clinical phase-3 study was conducted at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology between April 2019 and April 2021. Thirty-six eyes of 18 patients with toxic optic neuropathy (TON) were included in the study. Within 1-3 months after the emergency interventions, patients with various degrees of sequela visual disturbances were studied in this clinical trial. The cases were divided into three groups according to similar demographic characteristics. Group 1: Consists of 12 eyes of 12 patients treated with the WJ-MSC and rEMS combination in one eye. Group 2: Consists of 12 eyes of 12 patients treated with only rEMS in one eye. Group 3: Consists of 12 eyes of six patients treated with only WJ-MSC in both eyes. The course was evaluated by comparing the quantitive functional and structural assessment parameters measured before and at the fourth month of applications in each group.

resultsThe mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) delta change percentages of the groups can be ranked as: Group 1 (47%) > Group 3 (32%) > Group 2 (21%). The mean fundus perimetry deviation index (FPDI) delta change percentages of the groups can be ranked as: Group 1 (95%) > Group 2 (33%) > Group 3 (27%). The mean ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness delta change (decrease in thickness) percentages can be ranked as: Group 1 (- 21%) > Group 3 (- 15%) > Group 2 (- 13%). The visual evoked potential (VEP) P100 latency delta change percentages of the groups can be ranked as: Group 1 (- 18%) > Group 3 (- 10%) > Group 2 (- 8%). The P100 amplitude delta change percentages of the groups can be ranked as: Group 1 (105%) > Group 3 (83%) > Group 2 (24%).

conclusionToxic optic neuropathies are emergent pathologies that can result in acute and permanent blindness. After poisoning with toxic substances, progressive apoptosis continues in optic nerve axons and ganglion cells. After the proper first systemic intervention in intensive care clinic, the WJ-MSC and rEMS combination seems very effective in the short-term period in cases with TON. To prevent permanent blindness, a combination of WJ-MSC and rEMS application as soon as possible may increase the chance of success in currently untreatable cases. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04877067.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsWharton JellyCell DifferentiationElectromagnetic PhenomenaEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansProspective StudiesToxic Optic NeuropathyAmiodaroneCarbon dioxideElectromagnetic stimulationMethanolSildenafilStem cellToxic optic neuropathyWharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cell

Identifiers

PMID34579767
PMCPMC8477499
OpenAlexW3203726360

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.