Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580756›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2022

Multiple sclerosis epidemiological trends in Italy highlight the environmental risk factors.

M Puthenparampil, P Perini, R Bergamaschi, M Capobianco, M Filippi, P Gallo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M PuthenparampilDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua, via Giustiniani 5, 35128, Padua, Italy. marco.puthenparampil@unipd.it.
P PeriniMultiple Sclerosis Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padua, Italy.
R BergamaschiMultiple Sclerosis Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
M CapobiancoCentro di Riferimento Regionale Sclerosi Multipla (CReSM), SCDO Neurologia, AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
M FilippiUnit of Neurology, Unit of Neurorehabilitation and Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Institute, Milan, Italy.
P GalloDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua, via Giustiniani 5, 35128, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Italy is definitely a high-risk country for multiple sclerosis (MS). Over the last 50 years, several epidemiological studies, including longitudinal surveys, have disclosed that MS incidence and prevalence in Italy mainland and Islands (Sardinia and Sicily) have progressively increased, picturing a semi-parabolic curve. Based on the comprehensive scrutiny of 58 papers, we conclude that the latitude risk gradient does not fit to the Italian map of MS. The genetic heterogeneity of the Italian ethnicities, that likely forms the basis of MS predisposition, does not account for the dramatic increase of MS incidence and prevalence observed in Italy over the last half century that, rather, seems better explained by the effect of environmental factors.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisHumansIncidenceItalyPrevalenceRisk FactorsSicilyEpidemiologyIncidenceMultiple sclerosisPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID34580756
PMCPMC8940874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.