Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582125›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2021

Electrical properties and synaptic transmission in mouse intracardiac ganglion neurons in situ.

Alexander A Harper, David J Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander A HarperIllawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
David J AdamsIllawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7030-2288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic cardiac nervous system represents the final site of signal integration for neurotransmission to the myocardium to enable local control of cardiac performance. The electrophysiological characteristics and ganglionic transmission of adult mouse intrinsic cardiac ganglion (ICG) neurons were investigated using a whole-mount ganglion preparation of the excised right atrial ganglion plexus and intracellular microelectrode recording techniques. The passive and active electrical properties of ICG neurons and synaptic transmission including synaptic response strength and efficacy as a function of stimulation frequency were examined. The resting membrane potential and input resistance of ICG neurons were -47.9 ± 4.0 mV and 197.2 ± 81.5 MΩ, respectively. All neurons had somatic action potentials with overshoots of >+15 mV and after-hyperpolarizations having an average of 10 mV amplitude and ~45 ms half duration. Phasic discharge activities were recorded from the majority of neurons studied and several types of excitatory synaptic responses were recorded following inputs from the vagus or interganglionic nerve trunk(s). Most postganglionic neurons (>75%) received a strong, suprathreshold synaptic input and reliably followed high-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation up to at least 50 Hz. Nerve-evoked synaptic transmission was blocked by extracellular Cd

Indexed as

Action PotentialsSynaptic TransmissionAnimalsCadmiumConotoxinsHeartMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsNicotinic AntagonistsVagus NerveCadmiumConotoxinsNicotinic Antagonistselectrical propertiesintracardiac neuronnicotinic acetylcholine receptorsynaptic transmissionvagal stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34582125
PMCPMC8477906

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.